Peggy McCracken
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History 11
- Byzantine Studies and History 2
- History top 5%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
- History of Medicine Studies 2
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 3
- French Literature and Criticism 2
- Religious studies top 10%
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 4
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Karma LochrieDonald S. LopezKarl SteelYves BonnefoyAd PutterJ. A. BurrowJ GilbertValerie Traub
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peggy McCracken
17 papers receiving 80 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Classics 64
- History 54
- Literature and Literary Theory 31
- Religious studies 10
- History and Philosophy of Science 9
Countries citing papers authored by Peggy McCracken
This map shows the geographic impact of Peggy McCracken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peggy McCracken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peggy McCracken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peggy McCracken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peggy McCracken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peggy McCracken. The network helps show where Peggy McCracken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Peggy McCracken, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 3 | Barlaam and Josaphat: A Christian Tale of the Buddha | 2014 | 2 |
| 4 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 5 | Forgetting to Conclude | 2011 | 1 |
| 6 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 12 | The curse of Eve, the wound of the hero | 2003 | 4 |
| 13 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 17 | `The boy who was a girl': Reading gender in the Roman de Silence | 1994 | 8 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 1 |
About Peggy McCracken
Peggy McCracken is a scholar working on Classics, History and Philosophy of Science and History, having authored 26 papers that have together received 144 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (11 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), French Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers) and History of Medicine Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (64 citations), History (54 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (31 citations). Peggy McCracken has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karma Lochrie, Donald S. Lopez, Karl Steel, Yves Bonnefoy, Ad Putter, J. A. Burrow, J Gilbert, Valerie Traub, Jacques Derrida and Corinne Saunders. Their work appears in journals such as Exemplaria, Arthuriana, Signs, Australian Journal of French Studies and SubStance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.