Pedro León‐Lobos

680 citations
29 papers · 450 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Pedro León‐Lobos

28 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Pedro León‐Lobos
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 120
  • Plant Science 264
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 127
  • Forestry 23
  • Environmental Chemistry 49
Replace Mário Luís Garbin with:
Mário Luís Garbin Brazil
Tarun K. Mal United States
Sylvie Dupouyet France
Tomás E. Díaz Spain
Claude Lefèbvre Belgium
Maria Cristina Teixeira Braga Messias Brazil
Danghui Xu China
George N. Batianoff Australia
Wolf Gruber Belgium
Noé Manuel Montaño Mexico
Pedro León‐Lobos relative to Mário Luís Garbin Brazil Mário Luís Garbin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Mário Luís Garbin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pedro León‐Lobos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro León‐Lobos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro León‐Lobos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro León‐Lobos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pedro León‐Lobos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro León‐Lobos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro León‐Lobos. The network helps show where Pedro León‐Lobos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pedro León‐Lobos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pedro León‐Lobos Line = papers co-authored together Pedro León‐Lobos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201054
2 201144
3 201242
4 201742
5 201741
6 202039
7 200236
8 201536
9 201325
10 201921
11 202214
12 200914
13 20059
14 20106
15 20186
16 20224
17 20073
18 20203
19 20232
20 20231

About Pedro León‐Lobos

Pedro León‐Lobos is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Food Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 29 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seed Germination and Physiology (11 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (8 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (5 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (5 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (3 papers) and Heavy metals in environment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (120 citations), Plant Science (264 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (127 citations), Forestry (23 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (49 citations). Pedro León‐Lobos has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include R. H. Ellis, Rosanna Ginocchio, Michael Way, Hugh W. Pritchard, Claudia Santibáñez, Elena Bustamante, Juan L. Celis‐Diez, Alan J. M. Baker, Eduardo C. Arellano and Joel Flores. Their work appears in journals such as Seed Science Research, Gayana. Botánica, Plants, Conservation Genetics and Plant Ecology & Diversity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact