Pedro Beleza
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- João PinhoSoheyl NoachtarJan RémiChristian VollmarCarla FerreiraAurelia PeraudJoão Paulo Silva CunhaBerend Feddersen
- Topics
- Epilepsy research and treatment (7 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Pedro Beleza
16 papers receiving 284 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Psychiatry and Mental health 183
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 99
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 66
- Neurology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Pedro Beleza
This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro Beleza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro Beleza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro Beleza more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pedro Beleza
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro Beleza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro Beleza. The network helps show where Pedro Beleza may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pedro Beleza
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pedro Beleza. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pedro Beleza based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pedro Beleza. Pedro Beleza is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 43 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 84 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | [Wallerian degeneration after stroke: a new prognostic factor?]. | 1 |
| 15 | IgE-mediated hypersensitivity after ibuprofen administration. | 7 |
| 16 | [Reverse crossed cerebellar diaschisis]. | 2 |
About Pedro Beleza
Pedro Beleza is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (183 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (104 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations). Pedro Beleza has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include João Pinho, Soheyl Noachtar, Jan Rémi, Christian Vollmar, Carla Ferreira, Aurelia Peraud, João Paulo Silva Cunha, Berend Feddersen, Manuel Ribeiro and Margarida Rodrigues. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology and Epilepsy Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.