Paulo Amaral
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Forestry top 5%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Edson VidalChristopher UhlPaulo BarretoCarlos SouzaAna Cristina BarrosJeffrey J. GerwingJennifer S. JohnsAdalberto Veríssimo
- Topics
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers)Agricultural and Food Sciences (3 papers)Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (1 paper)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBioScienceForest Ecology and Management
- Partner nations
- United StatesCosta Rica
In The Last Decade
Paulo Amaral
5 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Global and Planetary Change 215
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 85
- Economics and Econometrics 62
- Forestry 47
- Ecology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Paulo Amaral
This map shows the geographic impact of Paulo Amaral's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paulo Amaral with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paulo Amaral more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paulo Amaral
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paulo Amaral. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paulo Amaral. The network helps show where Paulo Amaral may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paulo Amaral
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paulo Amaral. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paulo Amaral based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paulo Amaral. Paulo Amaral is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Evaluación de las condiciones, procesos y resultados del manejo forestal comunitario en la Amazonia brasileña | 1 |
| 3 | 153 | |
| 4 | Custos e benefícios do manejo florestal para produção de madeira na Amazônia Oriental | 6 |
| 5 | Floresta para sempre: um manual para produção de madeira na Amazônia | 9 |
| 6 | 105 |
About Paulo Amaral
Paulo Amaral is a scholar working on Forestry, Global and Planetary Change and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 6 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (3 papers) and Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (47 citations), Global and Planetary Change (215 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (85 citations). Paulo Amaral has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Edson Vidal, Christopher Uhl, Paulo Barreto, Carlos Souza, Ana Cristina Barros, Jeffrey J. Gerwing, Jennifer S. Johns, Paulo Barreto, Adalberto Veríssimo and Márcio Sales. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BioScience and Forest Ecology and Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.