Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Gas Storage in Nanoporous Materials
20081.4k citationsRussell E. Morris, Paul Wheatleyprofile →
Ionic liquids and eutectic mixtures as solvent and template in synthesis of zeolite analogues
20041.1k citationsEmily R. Cooper, C.D. Andrews et al.profile →
High-Capacity Hydrogen and Nitric Oxide Adsorption and Storage in a Metal−Organic Framework
2007529 citationsPaul Wheatley, Russell E. Morris et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Wheatley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Wheatley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Wheatley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Wheatley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Wheatley. The network helps show where Paul Wheatley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Wheatley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Wheatley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Wheatley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Wheatley. Paul Wheatley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wheatley, Paul, et al.. (2014). Sustainability assessments at the British Library: Formats, frameworks and findings. iPRES.
4.
Tian, Yuyang, Matthew J. McPherson, Paul Wheatley, & Russell E. Morris. (2014). Ionic Liquid assisted Synthesis of Zeolite‐TON. Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie. 640(6). 1177–1181.16 indexed citations
Wheatley, Paul, et al.. (2012). cRIsp: Crowdsourcing Representation Information to Support Preservation. iPRES.1 indexed citations
8.
Wheatley, Paul, et al.. (2010). LIFE3: A Predictive Costing Tool For Digital Collections.. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).3 indexed citations
Ayris, Paul, et al.. (2008). The LIFE2 final project report. 6(2). 101–4.19 indexed citations
11.
Wheatley, Paul, et al.. (2007). The LIFE Model v1.1. UCL Discovery (University College London).5 indexed citations
12.
McLeod, Raymond, Paul Wheatley, & Paul Ayris. (2006). Lifecycle information for e-literature: a summary from the LIFE project.. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Sandhu, Kernial Singh & Paul Wheatley. (1989). Management of Success. ISEAS Publishing eBooks.23 indexed citations
18.
Sandhu, Kernial Singh, et al.. (1983). Melaka : the transformation of a Malay capital, c. 1400-1980. Oxford University Press eBooks.34 indexed citations
19.
Reed, Robert R. & Paul Wheatley. (1976). City of pines : the origins of Baguio as a colonial hill station and regional capital.19 indexed citations
20.
Sandhu, Kernial Singh & Paul Wheatley. (1973). Early Malaysia : some observations on the nature of Indian contacts with pre-British Malaya.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.