Paul Trendelenburg
2 papers receiving 47 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Gastroenterology 29
- Surgery 15
- Pharmacy 14
- Physiology 11
- Molecular Biology 6
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Trendelenburg
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Trendelenburg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Trendelenburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Trendelenburg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Trendelenburg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Trendelenburg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Trendelenburg. The network helps show where Paul Trendelenburg may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44 | |
| 2 | 3 |
About Paul Trendelenburg
Paul Trendelenburg is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 2 papers that have together received 47 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper), Medical and Health Sciences Research (1 paper) and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (29 citations), Pharmacy (14 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (3 citations). Paul Trendelenburg has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Their work appears in journals such as Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.