Paul Strohm
Impact in
Papers in
- Classics 13
- Medieval Literature and History 13
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 1
- American and British Literature Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- Christopher Allmand (1 shared paper)Jean E. Howard (1 shared paper)Rosemary Horrox (1 shared paper)Mavis Mate (1 shared paper)S. H. Rigby (1 shared paper)Maryanne Kowaleski (1 shared paper)Valerie I. J. Flint (1 shared paper)Bruce Campbell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Studies in the age of Chaucer (4 papers)Speculum (3 papers)Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (2 papers)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Exemplaria (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Paul Strohm
24 papers receiving 200 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Classics 172
- History 125
- Literature and Literary Theory 60
- Language and Linguistics 35
- Religious studies 11
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Strohm
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Strohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Strohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Strohm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Strohm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Strohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Strohm. The network helps show where Paul Strohm may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Paul Strohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession, 1989-90. | 1990 | 65 |
| 2 | Theory and the premodern text | 2000 | 64 |
| 3 | 1992 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 12 | The Origin and Meaning of Middle English Romaunce | 1977 | 11 |
| 13 | 1979 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 16 | A Portrait of the Professoriate. | 1985 | 3 |
| 17 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 2 |
About Paul Strohm
Paul Strohm is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, History and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (13 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (4 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Anthropological Studies and Insights (1 paper) and Philippine History and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (172 citations), History (125 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (60 citations), Language and Linguistics (35 citations) and Religious studies (11 citations). Paul Strohm has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Allmand, Jean E. Howard, Rosemary Horrox, Mavis Mate, S. H. Rigby, Maryanne Kowaleski, Valerie I. J. Flint, Bruce Campbell, Michael Prestwich and Charles Phythian-Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in the age of Chaucer, Speculum, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, The American Historical Review and Exemplaria.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.