Paul Reip

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Paul Reip is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Reip has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Materials Chemistry, 6 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 3 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in Paul Reip's work include Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (15 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (6 papers) and Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers). Paul Reip is often cited by papers focused on Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (15 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (6 papers) and Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers). Paul Reip collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Italy. Paul Reip's co-authors include Robert P. Allaker, Guogang Ren, D. Hu, Eugenia Valsami‐Jones, Déborah Berhanu, Miren P. Cajaraville, Inmaculada Aróstegui, Alberto Katsumiti, Zeeshan Ahmad and Zhuo Yang and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Chemosphere and Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

In The Last Decade

Paul Reip

18 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

Characterisation of copper oxide nanoparticles for antimi... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 400 800 1.2k

Peers

Paul Reip
Hamid Mashayekhi United States
Appala Raju Badireddy United States
Amro M. El Badawy United States
J. Diendorf Germany
Kyunghee Choi South Korea
Paul Reip
Citations per year, relative to Paul Reip Paul Reip (= 1×) peers Katre Juganson

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Reip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Reip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Reip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Reip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Reip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Reip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Reip. The network helps show where Paul Reip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Reip

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Reip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Reip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Reip. Paul Reip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Jilani, Syeda Fizzah, et al.. (2019). A 60-GHz Ultra-Thin and Flexible Metasurface for Frequency-Selective Wireless Applications. Applied Sciences. 9(5). 945–945. 15 indexed citations
2.
Katsumiti, Alberto, Andrew J. Thorley, Inmaculada Aróstegui, et al.. (2018). Cytotoxicity and cellular mechanisms of toxicity of CuO NPs in mussel cells in vitro and comparative sensitivity with human cells. Toxicology in Vitro. 48. 146–158. 93 indexed citations
3.
Jilani, Syeda Fizzah, et al.. (2018). Design and characterisation of a screen-printed millimetre-wave flexible metasurface using copper ink for communication applications. Flexible and Printed Electronics. 3(4). 45005–45005. 14 indexed citations
4.
Lacave, José María, et al.. (2017). Cellular and molecular responses of adult zebrafish after exposure to CuO nanoparticles or ionic copper. Ecotoxicology. 27(1). 89–101. 21 indexed citations
5.
Engelsen, Daniel den, Terry G. Ireland, Paul G. Harris, et al.. (2016). Photoluminescence, cathodoluminescence and micro-Raman investigations of monoclinic nanometre-sized Y2O3 and Y2O3:Eu3+. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 4(38). 8930–8938. 19 indexed citations
6.
Katsumiti, Alberto, Alba Jimeno-Romero, Paul Reip, et al.. (2015). Short-term effects on antioxidant enzymes and long-term genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of CuO nanoparticles compared to bulk CuO and ionic copper in mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis. Marine Environmental Research. 111. 107–120. 80 indexed citations
7.
Katsumiti, Alberto, Déborah Berhanu, K. T. Howard, et al.. (2014). Cytotoxicity of TiO2nanoparticles to mussel hemocytes and gill cellsin vitro: Influence of synthesis method, crystalline structure, size and additive. Nanotoxicology. 9(5). 543–553. 52 indexed citations
8.
Mouneyrac, Catherine, Pierre‐Emmanuel Buffet, Laurence Poirier, et al.. (2014). Fate and effects of metal-based nanoparticles in two marine invertebrates, the bivalve mollusc Scrobicularia plana and the annelid polychaete Hediste diversicolor. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 21(13). 7899–7912. 78 indexed citations
9.
Lacave, José María, Miriam Oron, Paul Reip, et al.. (2014). Comparative toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO, ZnO and TiO2) to developing zebrafish embryos. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 16(8). 67 indexed citations
10.
Bucchianico, Sebastiano Di, Maria Rita Fabbrizi, Superb K. Misra, et al.. (2013). Multiple cytotoxic and genotoxic effects induced in vitro by differently shaped copper oxide nanomaterials. Mutagenesis. 28(3). 287–299. 64 indexed citations
11.
Buffet, Pierre‐Emmanuel, Marion Richard, Aurore Zalouk‐Vergnoux, et al.. (2012). A Mesocosm Study of Fate and Effects of CuO Nanoparticles on Endobenthic Species (Scrobicularia plana, Hediste diversicolor). Environmental Science & Technology. 47(3). 2660526275–2660526275. 121 indexed citations
12.
Jimeno-Romero, Alba, Déborah Berhanu, Paul Reip, et al.. (2012). Down the rabbit hole: Subcellular localization and x-ray microanalysis of a set of metallic nanoparticles in mussels. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 163. S23–S24. 1 indexed citations
13.
Katsumiti, Alberto, Déborah Berhanu, Eugenia Valsami‐Jones, et al.. (2012). Screening of cytotoxicity effects of different metal bearing nanoparticles on mussel hemocytes and gill cells in vitro. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 163. S25–S25. 1 indexed citations
14.
Yang, Zhuo, et al.. (2012). A Review of Nanoparticle Functionality and Toxicity on the Central Nervous System. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 313–332. 7 indexed citations
15.
Katsumiti, Alberto, et al.. (2012). Long-term genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of CuO nanoparticles on mussels. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 163. S50–S50. 1 indexed citations
16.
Buffet, Pierre‐Emmanuel, Olivia Fossi Tankoua, Jin‐Fen Pan, et al.. (2011). Behavioural and biochemical responses of two marine invertebrates Scrobicularia plana and Hediste diversicolor to copper oxide nanoparticles. Chemosphere. 84(1). 166–174. 218 indexed citations
17.
Yang, Zhuo, et al.. (2010). A review of nanoparticle functionality and toxicity on the central nervous system. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 7(suppl_4). S411–22. 189 indexed citations
18.
Ren, Guogang, et al.. (2009). Characterisation of copper oxide nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 33(6). 587–590. 1204 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026