Paul Pritchard
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
- History and Theory of Mathematics 10
- Algebra and Number Theory top 10%
- Analytic Number Theory Research 12
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Mathematics and Applications 4
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory 3
-
- Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization 4
-
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration 4
-
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
-
- Migration, Health and Trauma 3
- Co-authors
- Débora B. MaehlerHoward RamosLori WilkinsonMartha RadiceLuin GoldringJill L. GrantPatricia LandoltLi Shen
- Cited by
- Theoretical Computer ScienceAlgebra and Number TheoryDiscrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
- Journals
- Communications of the ACM (2 papers)Mathematics of Computation (6 papers)Journal of Algorithms (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Paul Pritchard
31 papers receiving 240 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Theoretical Computer Science 43
- Algebra and Number Theory 86
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 24
- Computational Mathematics 4
- Geometry and Topology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Pritchard
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Pritchard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Pritchard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Pritchard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Pritchard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Pritchard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Pritchard. The network helps show where Paul Pritchard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Paul Pritchard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 8 | An Introduction to Programming Using MacIntosh Pascal | 1988 | 2 |
| 9 | 1987 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 24 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 23 | |
| 17 | 1981 | 34 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 19 | Program Proving-Expression Languages. | 1977 | 4 |
| 20 | 1970 | 2 |
About Paul Pritchard
Paul Pritchard is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Algebra and Number Theory and Geometry and Topology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytic Number Theory Research (12 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (10 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (3 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (43 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (86 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (24 citations). Paul Pritchard has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Débora B. Maehler, Howard Ramos, Lori Wilkinson, Martha Radice, Luin Goldring, Jill L. Grant, Patricia Landolt, Li Shen, Hong Shen and David Gries. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Mathematics of Computation and Journal of Algorithms.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.