Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of David Gries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gries more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gries. The network helps show where David Gries may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Gries
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Gries.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Gries based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Gries. David Gries is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gries, David. (2005). Teaching program development. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 20(6). 1–2.1 indexed citations
2.
Gries, David. (2004). The mathematics of programming and why we should teach it. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 19(5). 2–2.1 indexed citations
Gries, David & Fred B. Schneider. (1993). Instructor's manual: a logical approach to discrete math. Springer eBooks.
6.
Gries, David. (1990). Specification and Transformation of Programs: A Formal Approach to Software Development. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
7.
Gries, David, et al.. (1989). 1988 Snowbird Report: A Discipline Matures.. Computer. 22. 72–75.3 indexed citations
8.
Gries, David. (1989). A hands-in-the pocket presentation of a k -majority vote algorithm. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks. 43–45.3 indexed citations
9.
Gries, David, et al.. (1989). Inorder traversal of a binary tree and its inversion. eCommons (Cornell University). 37–42.11 indexed citations
10.
Gries, David. (1989). The maximum-segment-sum problem. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks. 33–36.5 indexed citations
Gries, David. (1989). Influences (or lack thereof) of formalism in teaching programming and software engineering. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks. 229–236.5 indexed citations
13.
Gries, David. (1980). Educating the Programmer: Notation, Proofs, and the Development of Programs. eCommons (Cornell University). 935–944.2 indexed citations
14.
Gries, David. (1978). Programming Methodology: A Collection of Articles by Members of IFIP WG 2.3. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).20 indexed citations
Gries, David. (1968). Notational abbreviations applied to the syntax of ALGOL. 38–40.
20.
Gries, David. (1967). The use of transition matrices in compiling.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.