Paul Penn
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Papers in
-
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 3
-
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts 2
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 1
- Co-authors
- F. D. Rose (2 shared papers)David Parslow (1 shared paper)Elizabeth A. Attree (1 shared paper)Barbara Brooks (2 shared papers)David A. Johnson (1 shared paper)Andrew Hardwick (3 shared papers)Helen Petrie (3 shared papers)Diana Kornbrot (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal on Disability and Human Development (1 paper)Developmental Neurorehabilitation (1 paper)Ergonomics (1 paper)Psychology Teaching Review (2 papers)Perception & Psychophysics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Paul Penn
9 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Human-Computer Interaction 120
- Rehabilitation 61
- Cognitive Neuroscience 89
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 16
- Social Psychology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Penn
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Penn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Penn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Penn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Penn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Penn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Penn. The network helps show where Paul Penn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Paul Penn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 264 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 22 | |
| 4 | The perception of texture, object size and angularity by touch in virtual environments with two haptic devices | 2000 | 10 |
| 5 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 6 | Haptic virtual environments for blind people: further explorations with the Phantom device | 2000 | 3 |
| 7 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 0 |
About Paul Penn
Paul Penn is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Education, Automotive Engineering and Social Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (1 paper), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper), Higher Education Learning Practices (1 paper), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper) and Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (120 citations), Rehabilitation (61 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (89 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (16 citations) and Social Psychology (61 citations). Paul Penn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include F. D. Rose, David Parslow, Elizabeth A. Attree, Barbara Brooks, David A. Johnson, Andrew Hardwick, Helen Petrie, Diana Kornbrot, Chetz Colwell and Martlesham Heath. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal on Disability and Human Development, Developmental Neurorehabilitation, Ergonomics, Psychology Teaching Review and Perception & Psychophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.