Paul Penn

476 total citations
10 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

Paul Penn is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Penn has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 2 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Paul Penn's work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers). Paul Penn is often cited by papers focused on Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers). Paul Penn collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Paul Penn's co-authors include F. D. Rose, David Parslow, Elizabeth A. Attree, Barbara Brooks, David A. Johnson, Helen Petrie, Andrew Hardwick, Diana Kornbrot, Chetz Colwell and Martlesham Heath and has published in prestigious journals such as Ergonomics, Developmental Neurorehabilitation and International Journal on Disability and Human Development.

In The Last Decade

Paul Penn

8 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Paul Penn United Kingdom	4	130	95	72	64	55	10	327
Justin Munafo United States	6	306 2.4×	132 1.4×	34 0.5×	93 1.5×	61 1.1×	6	480
In Y. Kim South Korea	9	194 1.5×	142 1.5×	87 1.2×	107 1.7×	41 0.7×	10	532
Augusto García-Agúndez Germany	10	280 2.2×	105 1.1×	74 1.0×	77 1.2×	115 2.1×	24	598
Meg Diedrick United States	2	250 1.9×	76 0.8×	32 0.4×	68 1.1×	57 1.0×	4	377
Amanda Moody Australia	6	368 2.8×	132 1.4×	35 0.5×	92 1.4×	112 2.0×	8	562
Ana Grasielle Dionísio Corrêa Brazil	9	123 0.9×	75 0.8×	94 1.3×	21 0.3×	121 2.2×	50	315
Karin A. Buetler Switzerland	12	86 0.7×	166 1.7×	68 0.9×	40 0.6×	19 0.3×	25	310
Margarita Anastassova France	10	91 0.7×	135 1.4×	21 0.3×	36 0.6×	78 1.4×	35	323
Sergio Albiol-Pérez Spain	12	129 1.0×	88 0.9×	197 2.7×	31 0.5×	73 1.3×	35	534
Florian Kern Germany	7	212 1.6×	55 0.6×	93 1.3×	45 0.7×	92 1.7×	14	348

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Penn

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Penn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Penn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Penn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Penn

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Penn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Penn. The network helps show where Paul Penn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Penn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Penn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Penn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Penn. Paul Penn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Penn, Paul. (2019). The Psychology of Effective Studying: How to Succeed in Your Degree. 1 indexed citations

2.

Penn, Paul. (2019). The Psychology of Effective Studying. 1 indexed citations

3.

Penn, Paul, et al.. (2018). Making assessment promote effective learning practices: An example of ipsative assessment from the School of Psychology at UEL. Psychology Teaching Review. 24(2). 70–74. 1 indexed citations

4.

Penn, Paul, et al.. (2017). Enhancing feedback and feed–forward via integrated virtual learning environment based evaluation and support. Psychology Teaching Review. 23(2). 60–65. 3 indexed citations

5.

Penn, Paul, F. D. Rose, & David A. Johnson. (2009). Virtual enriched environments in paediatric neuropsychological rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: Feasibility, benefits and challenges. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 12(1). 32–43. 25 indexed citations

6.

Kornbrot, Diana, et al.. (2007). Roughness perception in haptic virtual reality for sighted and blind people. Perception & Psychophysics. 69(4). 502–512. 22 indexed citations

7.

Penn, Paul, et al.. (2005). Preliminary evaluation of a desktop PC-based virtual reality driving assessment. International Journal on Disability and Human Development. 4(4).

8.

Rose, F. D., Elizabeth A. Attree, Barbara Brooks, David Parslow, & Paul Penn. (2000). Training in virtual environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. Ergonomics. 43(4). 494–511. 261 indexed citations

9.

Petrie, Helen, et al.. (2000). Haptic virtual environments for blind people: further explorations with the Phantom device. 3 indexed citations

10.

Penn, Paul, et al.. (2000). The perception of texture, object size and angularity by touch in virtual environments with two haptic devices. University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire). 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact