Paul L. Pease

427 total citations
12 papers, 307 citations indexed

About

Paul L. Pease is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul L. Pease has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 307 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Paul L. Pease's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Color Science and Applications (3 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (2 papers). Paul L. Pease is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Color Science and Applications (3 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (2 papers). Paul L. Pease collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Paul L. Pease's co-authors include Anthony J. Adams, Russell L. De Valois, Kathy L. O’Keefe, J.P. Allen, Raphael Barbeito, Bruce Wick, Merrill J. Allen and Harold E. Bedell and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

Paul L. Pease

11 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Paul L. Pease United States	6	129	89	63	57	54	12	307
R Lakowski United Kingdom	14	136 1.1×	292 3.3×	43 0.7×	87 1.5×	72 1.3×	29	548
Neil R. A. Parry United Kingdom	10	90 0.7×	159 1.8×	4 0.1×	110 1.9×	14 0.3×	23	383
Margarita B. Zlatkova United Kingdom	15	319 2.5×	329 3.7×	3 0.0×	117 2.1×	45 0.8×	39	520
David C. Freeman United States	7	169 1.3×	18 0.2×	33 0.5×	69 1.2×	9 0.2×	11	349
Leon N. McLin United States	11	185 1.4×	287 3.2×		70 1.2×	14 0.3×	33	447
Bruce Drum United States	13	321 2.5×	267 3.0×	2 0.0×	157 2.8×	156 2.9×	45	564
Jan van de Kraats Netherlands	11	125 1.0×	366 4.1×		209 3.7×	17 0.3×	13	574
John Xie United States	7	43 0.3×	51 0.6×	109 1.7×	19 0.3×	1 0.0×	8	433
Gunilla Derefeldt Sweden	10	268 2.1×	101 1.1×		34 0.6×	108 2.0×	26	445
Thomas H. Harding United States	9	228 1.8×	46 0.5×		117 2.1×	24 0.4×	49	369

Countries citing papers authored by Paul L. Pease

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul L. Pease's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul L. Pease with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul L. Pease more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul L. Pease

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul L. Pease. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul L. Pease. The network helps show where Paul L. Pease may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul L. Pease

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul L. Pease. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul L. Pease based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul L. Pease. Paul L. Pease is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Wick, Bruce, et al.. (1995). VERGENCE FACILITY: ESTABLISHMENT OF CLINICAL NORMS. Optometry and Vision Science. 72(SUPPLEMENT). 215–215. 4 indexed citations

2.

O’Keefe, Kathy L., et al.. (1991). Variables affecting the spectral transmittance of light through porcelain veneer samples. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 66(4). 434–438. 66 indexed citations

3.

Pease, Paul L. & Raphael Barbeito. (1989). Axial chromatic aberration of the human eye: frequency or wavelength?. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 9(2). 215–217. 5 indexed citations

4.

Pease, Paul L., et al.. (1988). Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration of the Human Eye and Wavelength in Focus. Optometry and Vision Science. 65(2). 99–107. 17 indexed citations

5.

Pease, Paul L. & J.P. Allen. (1988). A New Test for Screening Color Vision. Optometry and Vision Science. 65(9). 729–738. 12 indexed citations

6.

Pease, Paul L., et al.. (1987). Optical density of human macular pigment. Vision Research. 27(5). 705–710. 100 indexed citations

7.

Pease, Paul L.. (1987). Joseph Fraunhofer (1787–1826) and heterochromatic photometry. Nature. 326(6108). 17–18. 3 indexed citations

8.

Pease, Paul L. & Anthony J. Adams. (1983). Macular Pigment Difference Spectrum from Sensitivity Measures of a Single Cone Mechanism. Optometry and Vision Science. 60(8). 667–672. 16 indexed citations

9.

Pease, Paul L.. (1980). Resource letter CCV-1: Color and color vision. American Journal of Physics. 48(11). 907–917. 1 indexed citations

10.

Pease, Paul L.. (1973). Eye movements in systemically paralyzed macaque monkeys. Vision Research. 13(2). 483–487. 5 indexed citations

11.

Valois, Russell L. De & Paul L. Pease. (1971). Contours and Contrast: Responses of Monkey Lateral Geniculate Nucleus Cells to Luminance and Color Figures. Science. 171(3972). 694–696. 77 indexed citations

12.

Pease, Paul L. & Merrill J. Allen. (1967). LOW CONTRAST VISUAL ACUITY AD THE EFFECTS OF AMBIENT ILLUMINATION, FILTERS AND SCATTER. Optometry and Vision Science. 44(4). 226–232. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact