Paul Keen

498 total citations
17 papers, 125 citations indexed

About

Paul Keen is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Keen has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 125 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 2 papers in History and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Paul Keen's work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (1 paper). Paul Keen is often cited by papers focused on Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (1 paper). Paul Keen collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Paul Keen's co-authors include Ina Ferris and Kevin Gilmartin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Eighteenth-Century Studies and Studies in Romanticism.

In The Last Decade

Paul Keen

10 papers receiving 85 citations

Peers

Paul Keen

LLT

HISTO

SPS

ANTHR

PSIR

Patricia Fumerton United States

Diego Saglia Italy

Laura Lunger Knoppers United States

Maria H. Frawley United States

Charles Nicholl

Martin Priestman United Kingdom

Laurie Shannon United States

Sharon Achinstein United States

Peter C. Herman United States

Dympna Callaghan United Kingdom

Patricia Fumerton United States

Paul Keen

59 ×0.9

LLT

40 ×1.0

HISTO

20 ×0.7

SPS

24 ×1.1

ANTHR

10 ×0.6

PSIR

Citations per year, relative to Paul Keen Paul Keen (= 1×) peers Patricia Fumerton

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Keen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Keen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Keen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Keen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Keen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Keen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Keen. The network helps show where Paul Keen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Keen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Keen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Keen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Keen. Paul Keen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

1.

Keen, Paul. (2023). “Merely an Independent Public Man”: Joseph Howe’s Public Works. Studies in Canadian Literature. 48(2). 63–83.

2.

Keen, Paul. (2020). The Philosopher in the Workshop: Romanticism and the New Utilitarianism. Studies in Romanticism. 59(4). 493–506.

3.

Keen, Paul & Kevin Gilmartin. (2020). The Popular Radical Press in Britain 1817–1821.

4.

Keen, Paul. (2020). A Defence of the Humanities in a Utilitarian Age.

5.

Keen, Paul. (2014). “Imagining What We Know”: The Humanities in a Utilitarian Age. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 73–87. 7 indexed citations

6.

Keen, Paul. (2012). Becoming Mongrel: Grotesque Complicity in Don LePan’s Animals. Studies in Canadian Literature. 37(1).

7.

Keen, Paul. (2012). Literature, Commerce, and the Spectacle of Modernity, 1750–1800. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 7 indexed citations

8.

Keen, Paul. (2012). Shelley on the Assembly Line: A Defence of the Humanities. 26(2). 136–146.

9.

Ferris, Ina & Paul Keen. (2009). Bookish histories : books, literature, and commercial modernity, 1700-1900. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks. 13 indexed citations

10.

Ferris, Ina & Paul Keen. (2009). Bookish Histories. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 2 indexed citations

11.

Keen, Paul. (2008). Foolish knowledge: the commercial modernity of the periodical press. European Romantic Review. 19(3). 199–218. 2 indexed citations

12.

Keen, Paul. (2006). The "Balloonomania": Science and Spectacle in 1780s England. Eighteenth-Century Studies. 39(4). 507–535. 11 indexed citations

13.

Keen, Paul. (2004). Revolutions in Romantic literature : an anthology of print culture, 1780-1832. 5 indexed citations

14.

Keen, Paul. (2002). "The Most Useful of Citizens": Towards a Romantic Literary Professionalism. Studies in Romanticism. 41(4). 627–627. 1 indexed citations

15.

Keen, Paul. (2000). The Doubled Edge: Identity and Alterity in the Poetry of Eavan Boland and Nuala Ni Dhomhnaill. Mosaic (Winnipeg). 33(3). 19.

16.

Keen, Paul. (1999). The Crisis of Literature in the 1790s. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 35 indexed citations

17.

Keen, Paul. (1999). The crisis of literature in the 1790s print culture and the public sphere. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact