Paul J. Cohen
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Geometry and Topology top 1%
- Mathematical Physics top 2%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- John R. RobertsMichael T. LotzeElaine S. JaffeSteven A. RosenbergMary GirtonJohn L. DoppmanAndrew J. DwyerReuben Hersh
- Topics
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers)advanced mathematical theories (3 papers)Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Paul J. Cohen
30 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 490
- Geometry and Topology 413
- Mathematical Physics 406
- Algebra and Number Theory 210
- Artificial Intelligence 195
Countries citing papers authored by Paul J. Cohen
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul J. Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul J. Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul J. Cohen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul J. Cohen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul J. Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul J. Cohen. The network helps show where Paul J. Cohen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul J. Cohen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul J. Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul J. Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul J. Cohen. Paul J. Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | The immunopathology of sequential tumor biopsies in patients treated with interleukin-2. Correlation of response with T-cell infiltration and HLA-DR expression. | 107 |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesisbreakdown → | 373 |
| 13 | 65 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 101 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Paul J. Cohen
Paul J. Cohen is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Mathematical Physics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), advanced mathematical theories (3 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (58 citations), Geometry and Topology (413 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (210 citations). Paul J. Cohen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John R. Roberts, Michael T. Lotze, Elaine S. Jaffe, Steven A. Rosenberg, Mary Girton, John L. Doppman, Andrew J. Dwyer, Reuben Hersh, Pei Hui and SH Boyer. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Radiology and The American Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.