Paul Grime

16 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Paul Grime
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Applied Psychology 163
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 99
  • Clinical Psychology 100
  • Social Psychology 93
  • General Health Professions 107
Replace Christopher Frueh with:
Christopher Frueh United States
Naomi Ennis Canada
Monica Gilbert Australia
Daniel D. Squires United States
Julie T. Kinn United States
Keris Jän Myrick United States
Milagra S Tyler United States
Adam Abba‐Aji Canada
Akhtar Bibi Germany
Kristin Silfvernagel Sweden
Paul Grime relative to Christopher Frueh United States Christopher Frueh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Christopher Frueh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Grime

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Grime's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Grime with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Grime more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Grime

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Grime. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Grime. The network helps show where Paul Grime may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Paul Grime, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Grime Line = papers co-authored together Paul Grime links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201387
2 200482
3 201456
4 201950
5 201123
6 201518
7 200513
8 199513
9 20018
10 20035
11 20003
12 20192
13 20111
14 20151
15 20141
16 19951
17 19871
18 20180
19 20210

About Paul Grime

Paul Grime is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Infectious Diseases and Pharmacology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers) and Stress and Burnout Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (163 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations), Clinical Psychology (100 citations), Social Psychology (93 citations) and General Health Professions (107 citations). Paul Grime has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Jackson-Koku, Graham Thornicroft, Justine Schneider, Pooria Sarrami, Paul McCrone, Rachel Phillips, Richard Morriss, M Leese, Iris Molosankwe and Ira Madan. Their work appears in journals such as Occupational Medicine, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, Medical Education and Journal of Viral Hepatitis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact