Daniel D. Squires

638 citations
17 papers · 468 indexed · h-index 11

Daniel D. Squires

16 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Daniel D. Squires
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Applied Psychology 149
  • General Health Professions 196
  • Epidemiology 203
  • Clinical Psychology 93
  • Health 37
Replace Doug Polcin with:
Doug Polcin United States
Aruna Gogineni United States
Tiffany Kyle United States
Todd C. Campbell United States
Eva Turrigiano United States
Gregor Burkhart Portugal
Kristin Bumgardner United States
Monica Canning‐Ball United States
Diane E. Logan United States
Aaron Brown United States
Daniel D. Squires relative to Doug Polcin United States Doug Polcin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Doug Polcin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Squires

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Squires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Squires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Squires more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Squires

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Squires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Squires. The network helps show where Daniel D. Squires may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel D. Squires, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel D. Squires Line = papers co-authored together Daniel D. Squires links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 202016
2 201830
3 201819
4 201535
5 201525
6 201415
7 20141
8 201317
9 20091
10 20088
11 200749
12 2005157
13 200334
14
Motivational interviewing. A guideline developed for the Behavioral Health Recovery Management project.
20011
15
The community reinforcement approach: a guideline developed for the Behavioral Health Recovery Management Project.
20015
16
Association of Learning Technology Journal, ALT-J
20001
17 199954

About Daniel D. Squires

Daniel D. Squires is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 17 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (149 citations), General Health Professions (196 citations), Epidemiology (203 citations), Clinical Psychology (93 citations) and Health (37 citations). Daniel D. Squires has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Reid K. Hester, Harold D. Delaney, Sara J. Becker, David R. Strong, John Lauriello, Caron Zlotnick, Michael J. Mello, Chantal Tapé, Esther K. Choo and Michael P. Bogenschutz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026