Daniel D. Squires

638 total citations
17 papers, 468 citations indexed

About

Daniel D. Squires is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel D. Squires has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 468 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Epidemiology, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Daniel D. Squires's work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). Daniel D. Squires is often cited by papers focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). Daniel D. Squires collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Daniel D. Squires's co-authors include Reid K. Hester, Harold D. Delaney, Sara J. Becker, David R. Strong, Caron Zlotnick, Sarah A. Helseth, Michael J. Mello, John Lauriello, William P. Horan and Juan Bustillo and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

In The Last Decade

Daniel D. Squires

16 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel D. Squires United States	11	203	196	149	93	59	17	468
Doug Polcin United States	6	234 1.2×	189 1.0×	80 0.5×	143 1.5×	57 1.0×	7	460
Megan Ivey United States	12	262 1.3×	173 0.9×	115 0.8×	60 0.6×	60 1.0×	15	414
Julie D. Yeterian United States	13	232 1.1×	212 1.1×	74 0.5×	193 2.1×	52 0.9×	22	474
Tiffany Kyle United States	10	152 0.7×	122 0.6×	158 1.1×	52 0.6×	81 1.4×	14	388
Maureen J. Levine United States	12	156 0.8×	136 0.7×	167 1.1×	102 1.1×	46 0.8×	24	416
Todd C. Campbell United States	9	127 0.6×	183 0.9×	63 0.4×	165 1.8×	38 0.6×	17	462
Diane E. Logan United States	13	286 1.4×	189 1.0×	124 0.8×	146 1.6×	65 1.1×	21	537
Monica Roy United States	11	158 0.8×	122 0.6×	134 0.9×	238 2.6×	49 0.8×	20	536
Eva Turrigiano United States	8	136 0.7×	143 0.7×	175 1.2×	40 0.4×	77 1.3×	11	345
Noelle Jensen United States	11	347 1.7×	129 0.7×	104 0.7×	187 2.0×	52 0.9×	13	508

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Squires

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Squires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Squires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Squires more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Squires

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Squires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Squires. The network helps show where Daniel D. Squires may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel D. Squires

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel D. Squires. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel D. Squires based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel D. Squires. Daniel D. Squires is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Becker, Sara J., Sarah A. Helseth, Daniel D. Squires, et al.. (2020). User-informed marketing versus standard description to drive demand for evidence-based therapy: A randomized controlled trial.. American Psychologist. 75(8). 1038–1051. 16 indexed citations

Helseth, Sarah A., Tim Janssen, Kelli Scott, Daniel D. Squires, & Sara J. Becker. (2018). Training community-based treatment providers to implement contingency management for opioid addiction: Time to and frequency of adoption. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 95. 26–34. 30 indexed citations

Becker, Sara J., et al.. (2018). Factors Associated with Contingency Management Adoption among Opioid Treatment Providers Receiving a Comprehensive Implementation Strategy. Substance Abuse. 40(1). 56–60. 19 indexed citations

Becker, Sara J., Daniel D. Squires, David R. Strong, et al.. (2015). Training Opioid Addiction Treatment Providers to Adopt Contingency Management: A Prospective Pilot Trial of a Comprehensive Implementation Science Approach. Substance Abuse. 37(1). 134–140. 25 indexed citations

Choo, Esther K., Caron Zlotnick, David R. Strong, et al.. (2015). BSAFER: A Web-Based Intervention for Drug use and Intimate Partner Violence Demonstrates Feasibility and Acceptability among Women in the Emergency Department. Substance Abuse. 37(3). 441–449. 35 indexed citations

Choo, Esther K., Megan L. Ranney, Terrie Fox Wetle, et al.. (2014). Attitudes Toward Computer Interventions for Partner Abuse and Drug Use Among Women in the Emergency Department. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment. 14(2). 95–104. 15 indexed citations

Choo, Esther K., Megan L. Ranney, Terrie Wetle, et al.. (2014). Attitudes toward computer interventions for partner abuse and drug use among women in the emergency department. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 146. e247–e247. 1 indexed citations

Montague, Brian T., Christopher W. Kahler, Suzanne M. Colby, et al.. (2013). Attitudes and Training Needs of New England HIV Care and Addiction Treatment Providers. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment. 14(1). 16–28. 17 indexed citations

Squires, Daniel D. & Reid K. Hester. (2009). Treatment Provider Perceptions and Utilization of a PC-based Brief Motivational Intervention for Problem Drinkers. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment. 8(3). 119–127. 1 indexed citations

10.

Hester, Reid K. & Daniel D. Squires. (2008). Web-based norms for the Drinker Inventory of Consequences from the Drinker's Checkup. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 35(3). 322–327. 8 indexed citations

11.

Squires, Daniel D., et al.. (2007). Training substance abuse treatment organizations to adopt evidence-based practices: The Addiction Technology Transfer Center of New England Science to Service Laboratory. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 34(3). 293–301. 49 indexed citations

12.

Hester, Reid K., Daniel D. Squires, & Harold D. Delaney. (2005). The Drinker’s Check-up: 12-month outcomes of a controlled clinical trial of a stand-alone software program for problem drinkers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 28(2). 159–169. 157 indexed citations

13.

Squires, Daniel D. & Reid K. Hester. (2003). Using technical innovations in clinical practice: The Drinker's Check‐Up software program. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 60(2). 159–169. 34 indexed citations

14.

Squires, Daniel D. & Theresa B. Moyers. (2001). Motivational interviewing. A guideline developed for the Behavioral Health Recovery Management project.. 1 indexed citations

15.

Meyers, Robert J. & Daniel D. Squires. (2001). The community reinforcement approach: a guideline developed for the Behavioral Health Recovery Management Project.. 5 indexed citations

16.

Squires, Daniel D., et al.. (2000). Association of Learning Technology Journal, ALT-J. Explore Bristol Research. 1 indexed citations

17.

Squires, Daniel D., et al.. (1999). Examining an Affect Regulation Model of Substance Abuse in Schizophrenia. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 187(2). 72–79. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact