Paul de Lacy

5.3k total citations
22 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Paul de Lacy is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul de Lacy has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 11 papers in Linguistics and Language and 7 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Paul de Lacy's work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (15 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (11 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (6 papers). Paul de Lacy is often cited by papers focused on Phonetics and Phonology Research (15 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (11 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (6 papers). Paul de Lacy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and New Zealand. Paul de Lacy's co-authors include Angela Carpenter, Jill N. Beckman, John Kingston, Carlos Gussenhoven, Keren Rice, Matthew Gordon, John J. McCarthy, John Alderete, Draga Zec and Eric Baković and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cognitive Science and Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

In The Last Decade

Paul de Lacy

22 papers receiving 990 citations

Peers

Paul de Lacy
Jill N. Beckman United States
Diana Archangeli United States
David Odden United States
Draga Zec United States
Gregory K. Iverson United States
Donca Steriade United States
Elizabeth Hume United States
Ellen M. Kaisse United States
Armin Mester United States
Jill N. Beckman United States
Paul de Lacy
Citations per year, relative to Paul de Lacy Paul de Lacy (= 1×) peers Jill N. Beckman

Countries citing papers authored by Paul de Lacy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul de Lacy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul de Lacy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul de Lacy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul de Lacy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul de Lacy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul de Lacy. The network helps show where Paul de Lacy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul de Lacy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul de Lacy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul de Lacy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul de Lacy. Paul de Lacy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lacy, Paul de. (2020). Do morphophonological exchange rules exist? A reply to DiCanio et al. (2020). 2(4). 29–43. 2 indexed citations
2.
Lacy, Paul de, et al.. (2019). Evidence for Sonority-Driven Stress. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18. 9–9. 4 indexed citations
3.
Lacy, Paul de, et al.. (2017). The Long and Short of It: The Role of Verb Stem Vowel Duration in Sentence Processing.. Cognitive Science. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lacy, Paul de & John Kingston. (2013). Synchronic explanation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. 31(2). 287–355. 28 indexed citations
6.
Lacy, Paul de, John Alderete, Alan Prince, et al.. (2007). The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 201 indexed citations
7.
Lacy, Paul de. (2006). Transmissibility and the role of the phonological component. Theoretical Linguistics. 32(2). 185–196. 10 indexed citations
8.
Lacy, Paul de. (2006). Markedness. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 111 indexed citations
9.
Lacy, Paul de. (2004). Markedness conflation in Optimality Theory. Phonology. 21(2). 145–199. 73 indexed citations
10.
Lacy, Paul de. (2002). Constraint Universality and Prosodic Phrasing in Māori. Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University). 28(1). 4. 4 indexed citations
11.
Lacy, Paul de. (2002). Conflation and Scales. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst). 32(1). 7. 4 indexed citations
12.
Lacy, Paul de. (2002). The formal expression of markedness. Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University). 160 indexed citations
13.
Lacy, Paul de. (2002). The interaction of tone and stress in Optimality Theory. Phonology. 19(1). 1–32. 117 indexed citations
14.
Lacy, Paul de. (2000). Morphological Haplology and Correspondence. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst). 26(1). 8. 14 indexed citations
15.
Bye, Patrik & Paul de Lacy. (2000). Edge Asymmetries in Phonology and Morphology. North East Linguistics Society. 30(1). 10. 12 indexed citations
16.
Lacy, Paul de. (2000). A Correspondence Theory of Morpheme Order. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 1 indexed citations
17.
Lacy, Paul de, et al.. (1999). Correspondence and epenthetic quality. Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University). 16(2). 34 indexed citations
18.
Lacy, Paul de, et al.. (1999). A Correspondence Theory of Epenthetic Quality. 6 indexed citations
19.
Lacy, Paul de. (1998). Thematic and Structural Affinities: The Wanderer and Ecclesiastes. Neophilologus. 82(1). 125–137. 2 indexed citations
20.
Beckman, Jill N., et al.. (1995). Papers in optimality theory. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 406 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026