Elizabeth Hume

41 papers receiving 890 citations

Peers

Elizabeth Hume
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 903
  • Linguistics and Language 663
  • Artificial Intelligence 476
  • Language and Linguistics 443
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 121
Replace Diana Archangeli with:
Diana Archangeli United States
Timothy J. Vance Japan
Gregory K. Iverson United States
Natasha Warner United States
Paul de Lacy United States
Louis Goldstein United States
Sallyanne Palethorpe Australia
Donca Steriade United States
San Duanmu United States
Ellen M. Kaisse United States
Elizabeth Hume relative to Diana Archangeli United States Diana Archangeli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Diana Archangeli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Hume

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Hume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Hume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Hume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Hume

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Hume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Hume. The network helps show where Elizabeth Hume may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Hume

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Hume. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Hume based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Hume. Elizabeth Hume is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
The Superfluity of [Consonantal]
0
2 12
3 56
4
Phonological Markedness and its Relation to the Uncertainty of Words
5
5
The influence of preceding consonant on perceptual epenthesis in Japanese.
4
6 7
7 14
8
Introducing Maltese Linguistics
8
9
Markedness and the language user
14
10 1
11 42
12 5
13 181
14
Language specific markedness: The case of place of articulation
30
15 13
16 23
17 6
18
Metathesis in Maltese: Implication for the Strong Morphemic Plane Hypothesis
2
19
Front Vowels, Palatal Consonants and the Rule of Umlaut in Korean
19
20 32

About Elizabeth Hume

Elizabeth Hume is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (29 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (21 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (663 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (903 citations) and Language and Linguistics (443 citations). Elizabeth Hume has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Keith Johnson, William D. Raymond, Mark A. Pitt, Scott F. Kiesling, Kathleen Currie Hall, Andrew Wedel, T. Florian Jaeger, Aone van Engelenhoven, Jeff Mielke and David Odden. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Language and Speech Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026