Paul Davis
- Ecology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- John TownshendChengquan HuangSunghee KimKuan SongSamuel N. GowardT. M. McMillanJeffrey G. MasekArlene Vetere
- Topics
- Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Paul Davis
40 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- Ecology 352
- Global and Planetary Change 286
- Cognitive Neuroscience 172
- Clinical Psychology 171
- Epidemiology 150
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Davis
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Davis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Davis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Davis. The network helps show where Paul Davis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Davis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Davis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Davis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Davis. Paul Davis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 66 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 77 | |
| 7 | 127 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy in the Treatment of Addiction: A Treatment Planner for Clinicians | 2 |
| 11 | Scanlon Principles and Processes: Building Excellence at Watermark Credit Union | 0 |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 133 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | Real-time payload monitoring of the HIPPARCOS satellite. | 1 |
| 20 | 42 |
About Paul Davis
Paul Davis is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Forestry and Applied Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (147 citations), Ecological Modeling (63 citations) and Ecology (352 citations). Paul Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include John Townshend, Chengquan Huang, Sunghee Kim, Kuan Song, Samuel N. Goward, T. M. McMillan, Jeffrey G. Masek, Arlene Vetere, John Musinsky and Alice Altstatt. Their work appears in journals such as Remote Sensing of Environment, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Addiction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.