Ken Checinski

11 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Ken Checinski
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Clinical Psychology 136
  • Social Psychology 119
  • General Decision Sciences 10
  • General Health Professions 138
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 63
Replace Mark A. Belding with:
Mark A. Belding United States
Colin Bradbury United Kingdom
Kathlene Tracy United States
Emma Black Australia
Lois R. Chatham United States
Rosemary Kingston Australia
Deborah Medoff United States
Agatha Hinman United States
Michael S. Shopshire United States
Daniel D. Squires United States
Ken Checinski relative to Mark A. Belding United States Mark A. Belding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Mark A. Belding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Checinski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Checinski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Checinski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Checinski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Checinski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Checinski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Checinski. The network helps show where Ken Checinski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ken Checinski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Checinski Line = papers co-authored together Ken Checinski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2002119
2 199664
3 200858
4 201136
5 200833
6 200828
7 200513
8 20135
9 19925
10 20131
11 20101

About Ken Checinski

Ken Checinski is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers) and Psychedelics and Drug Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (136 citations), Social Psychology (119 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations), General Health Professions (138 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (63 citations). Ken Checinski has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Raja Mukherjee, Jonathan Campion, Jo Nurse, Colin Drummond, Ann McNeill, Joanna Moncrieff, Paul Davis, Mohammed T. Abou‐Saleh, Stuart F. White and Luke Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Harm Reduction Journal, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, BMJ, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Advances in Psychiatric Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact