Paul D. Escott

809 citations
35 papers · 288 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Paul D. Escott

22 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers

Paul D. Escott
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Marketing 94
  • Political Science and International Relations 113
  • Anthropology 37
  • Sociology and Political Science 164
  • History 38
Replace Harry L. Watson with:
Harry L. Watson United States
Brian Steel Wills United States
Susan E. Hirsch United States
Amy Dru Stanley United States
Pauline Maier United States
Robert E. Shalhope United States
Lee Chambers-Schiller United States
Arthur Zilversmit United States
Peter Rachleff United States
Eric Arnesen United States
Paul D. Escott relative to Harry L. Watson United States Harry L. Watson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Harry L. Watson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul D. Escott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul D. Escott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul D. Escott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul D. Escott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul D. Escott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul D. Escott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul D. Escott. The network helps show where Paul D. Escott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul D. Escott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul D. Escott Line = papers co-authored together Paul D. Escott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20161
2 20090
3 20082
4
Major problems in the history of the American South : documents and essays
19991
5
A People and a Nation: A History of the United States (Volume II, Since 1865)
19970
6 199415
7
A people and a nation: a history of the United States, volume I: to 1877
19941
8 19922
9 19916
10 199129
11 19901
12 19882
13 198628
14 19867
15 19865
16 19861
17 19823
18 198234
19 198036
20 19781

About Paul D. Escott

Paul D. Escott is a scholar working on Marketing, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Anthropology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (18 papers), American History and Culture (16 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (13 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Cuban History and Society (1 paper) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (94 citations), Political Science and International Relations (113 citations), Anthropology (37 citations), Sociology and Political Science (164 citations) and History (38 citations). Paul D. Escott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Drew Gilpin Faust, George P. Rawick, Roger L. Ransom, Thomas B. Alexander, David M. Katzman, Howard P. Chudacoff, Thomas G. Paterson, William M. Tuttle, Mary Beth Norton and Christopher Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Southern History, The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Civil War history.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026