Paul C. Cockrum
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
-
- Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Papers in
- Oncology 17
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 14
- Lung Cancer Research Studies 3
-
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 5
- Co-authors
- Julie Y. Crider (1 shared paper)Robert L. Abshire (1 shared paper)Barry A. Schlech (1 shared paper)Andy Surinach (11 shared papers)Michael T. Jones (1 shared paper)Patti Whyte (2 shared papers)John H Wlodarczyk (2 shared papers)Hugh Ringland Taylor (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer Medicine (4 papers)Annals of Oncology (3 papers)Future Oncology (2 papers)Frontiers in Oncology (2 papers)Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceChina
In The Last Decade
Paul C. Cockrum
33 papers receiving 382 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Ophthalmology 121
- Otorhinolaryngology 21
- Microbiology 3
- Urology 19
- Oncology 75
Countries citing papers authored by Paul C. Cockrum
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul C. Cockrum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul C. Cockrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul C. Cockrum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul C. Cockrum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul C. Cockrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul C. Cockrum. The network helps show where Paul C. Cockrum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul C. Cockrum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 54 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 6 |
About Paul C. Cockrum
Paul C. Cockrum is a scholar working on Oncology, Ophthalmology, Cancer Research, Epidemiology and Neurology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (14 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (4 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (3 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (2 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (121 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (21 citations), Microbiology (3 citations), Urology (19 citations) and Oncology (75 citations). Paul C. Cockrum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and China. Frequent co-authors include Julie Y. Crider, Robert L. Abshire, Barry A. Schlech, Andy Surinach, Michael T. Jones, Patti Whyte, John H Wlodarczyk, Hugh Ringland Taylor, Mark S. Dorfman and David W. Stroman. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Medicine, Annals of Oncology, Future Oncology, Frontiers in Oncology and Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.