Paul Byron

1.7k total citations
46 papers, 974 citations indexed

About

Paul Byron is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Byron has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 974 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Gender Studies, 23 papers in Clinical Psychology and 23 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Paul Byron's work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (32 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (22 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (9 papers). Paul Byron is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Feminism, and Media (32 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (22 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (9 papers). Paul Byron collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Paul Byron's co-authors include Kath Albury, Katerina Litsou, Alan McKee, Roger Ingham, Brady Robards, Sonja Vivienne, Brendan Churchill, Benjamin Hanckel, Clifton Evers and Kate Crawford and has published in prestigious journals such as Vaccine, New Media & Society and Archives of Sexual Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Paul Byron

43 papers receiving 924 citations

Peers

Paul Byron
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Gender Studies 564
  • Clinical Psychology 528
  • Sociology and Political Science 503
  • Social Psychology 170
  • General Health Professions 161
Replace Elise Carrotte with:
Elise Carrotte Australia
Janna L. Kim United States
Carol J. Pardun United States
Andrea Waling Australia
Sven‐Axel Månsson Sweden
Laina Y. Bay‐Cheng United States
Gail Hawkes Australia
Bianca Fileborn Australia
Rachel M. Schmitz United States
Megan K. Maas United States
Elise Carrotte Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Paul Byron
Paul Byron · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Paul Byron
Paul Byron · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Byron

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Byron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Byron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Byron more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Byron

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Byron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Byron. The network helps show where Paul Byron may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Byron

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Byron. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Byron based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Byron. Paul Byron is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 0
4 1
5 0
6 13
7 6
8 5
9 84
10 31
11 26
12 2
13
"Hey, i'm having these experiences": Tumblr use and young people's queer (dis)connections
30
14 65
15 19
16 6
17 26
18
Young people and sexting in Australia: Ethics, representation and the law
46
19
Young people, social media, social network sites and sexual health communication in Australia
6
20 16

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026