Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The prevalence of child maltreatment in Australia: findings from a national survey
202398 citationsBen Mathews, Rosana Pacella et al.profile →
The prevalence and nature of multi‐type child maltreatment in Australia
202355 citationsDaryl Higgins, Ben Mathews et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Mathews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Mathews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Mathews more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Mathews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Mathews. The network helps show where Ben Mathews may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Mathews
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Mathews.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Mathews based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Mathews. Ben Mathews is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mathews, Ben. (2015). Submission to the External Independent Review of the United Nations Response to Allegations of Sexual Exploitation and Abuse and Other Serious Crimes by Members of Foreign Military Forces Not Under United Nations Command in the Central African Republic. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Albury, Kath, Kate Crawford, Paul Byron, & Ben Mathews. (2013). Young people and sexting in Australia: Ethics, representation and the law. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).46 indexed citations
Mathews, Ben. (2011). Female genital mutilation :Australian law, policy and practical challenges for doctors. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
15.
Butler, Des, Ben Mathews, Ann Farrell, & Kerryann Walsh. (2009). Teachers’ duties to report suspected child abuse and tortious liability. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).5 indexed citations
16.
Mathews, Ben, Kerryann Walsh, Mehdi Rassafiani, Des Butler, & Ann Farrell. (2009). Teachers reporting suspected child sexual abuse :results of a three-state study. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 32(3). 772.19 indexed citations
17.
Mathews, Ben, et al.. (2008). Test Results from a Precise Positioning and Attitude Determination System for Microsatellites using a Software-Defined Radio. 769–774.1 indexed citations
18.
Mathews, Ben. (2004). Judicial Considerations of Reasonable Conduct by Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 27(3). 631.2 indexed citations
19.
Mathews, Ben. (2003). Limitation Periods and Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Law, Psychology, Time and Justice. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
20.
Willmott, Lindy, et al.. (2003). Defacto Relationships Property Adjustment Law - A National Direction. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.