Paul Billingham

471 citations
25 papers · 142 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Billingham

22 papers receiving 127 citations

Peers

Paul Billingham
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Philosophy 43
  • Political Science and International Relations 89
  • Law 28
  • Communication 13
  • Sociology and Political Science 59
Replace Maxime Lepoutre with:
Maxime Lepoutre United Kingdom
Anthony Simon Laden United States
Chaim Gans Israel
Brian Kogelmann United States
A. P. Simester United Kingdom
Jan M. Broekman United States
Dietrich Busse Germany
Mordechai Kremnitzer Israel
David Lefkowitz United States
Folke Tersman Sweden
Paul Billingham relative to Maxime Lepoutre United Kingdom Maxime Lepoutre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Maxime Lepoutre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Billingham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Billingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Billingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Billingham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Billingham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Billingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Billingham. The network helps show where Paul Billingham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Paul Billingham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Billingham Line = papers co-authored together Paul Billingham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202032
2 202019
3 201915
4 201514
5 201611
6 20159
7 20166
8 20175
9 20234
10 20184
11 20193
12 20183
13 20193
14 20192
15 20212
16 20172
17 20152
18 20192
19 20071
20 20231

About Paul Billingham

Paul Billingham is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Law and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 142 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (13 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Religious Freedom and Discrimination (3 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (43 citations), Political Science and International Relations (89 citations), Law (28 citations), Communication (13 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (59 citations). Paul Billingham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Tom Parr, Anthony R. Taylor, Matteo Bonotti and Jonathan Chaplin. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, European Journal of Political Theory, Politics Philosophy & Economics, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice and Oxford Journal of Law and Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact