Brian Kogelmann

509 citations
40 papers · 182 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Kogelmann

37 papers receiving 170 citations

Peers

Brian Kogelmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Political Science and International Relations 124
  • Philosophy 41
  • General Decision Sciences 5
  • Law 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 69
Replace Daniel Viehoff with:
Daniel Viehoff United States
Andrew Lister Canada
Bas van der Vossen United States
Micah Schwartzman United States
Saladin Meckled‐García United Kingdom
Blain Neufeld United States
S. A. Lloyd United States
Páll S. Árdal Canada
David R. Mapel United States
Grant Lamond United Kingdom
Brian Kogelmann relative to Daniel Viehoff United States Daniel Viehoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Daniel Viehoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Kogelmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Kogelmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Kogelmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Kogelmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Kogelmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Kogelmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Kogelmann. The network helps show where Brian Kogelmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Brian Kogelmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Kogelmann Line = papers co-authored together Brian Kogelmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201630
2 202117
3 201814
4 201614
5 201811
6 20189
7 20227
8 20187
9 20226
10 20216
11 20156
12 20235
13 20214
14 20174
15 20194
16 20243
17 20233
18 20243
19 20193
20 20173

About Brian Kogelmann

Brian Kogelmann is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 40 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (22 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Free Will and Agency (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (124 citations), Philosophy (41 citations), General Decision Sciences (5 citations), Law (17 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (69 citations). Brian Kogelmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Alexander William Salter, Bryan Leonard and Peter J. Boettke. Their work appears in journals such as Politics Philosophy & Economics, Episteme, Synthese, Public Choice and Journal of Business Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact