Jonathan Chaplin
- Plant Science
- Soil Science top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Mechanical Engineering
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Co-authors
- John ShutskeRimfiel JaniusYing ZhaoDavid RuggPaul MarshallN. G. HemmingMin MinRobert Joustra
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers)Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Chaplin
35 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Plant Science 63
- Soil Science 58
- Sociology and Political Science 52
- Mechanical Engineering 52
- Civil and Structural Engineering 51
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Chaplin
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Chaplin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Chaplin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Chaplin. The network helps show where Jonathan Chaplin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Chaplin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Chaplin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Chaplin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Chaplin. Jonathan Chaplin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | God and Government | 1 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | God and Global Order: The Power of Religion in American Foreign Policy | 4 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Compaction Remediation for Construction Sites | 3 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Defining "Public Justice" in a Pluralistic Society: Probing a Key Neo-Calvinist Insight | 2 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | Evaluation of large area field sampling methods for crop residue coverage measurement | 2 |
| 19 | Collision avoidance sensing for slow moving agricultural vehicles | 1 |
| 20 | 16 |
About Jonathan Chaplin
Jonathan Chaplin is a scholar working on Religious studies, Law and Soil Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers) and Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (58 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (12 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (23 citations). Jonathan Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Shutske, Rimfiel Janius, Ying Zhao, David Rugg, Paul Marshall, N. G. Hemming, Min Min, Robert Joustra, John Witte and Nick Spencer. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the ASABE, Applied Engineering in Agriculture and Palgrave Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.