Patrick J. Scanlon
About
In The Last Decade
Patrick J. Scanlon
137 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 3.0k
- Surgery 1.7k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.4k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 822
- Biomedical Engineering 494
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick J. Scanlon
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick J. Scanlon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick J. Scanlon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick J. Scanlon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick J. Scanlon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick J. Scanlon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick J. Scanlon. The network helps show where Patrick J. Scanlon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick J. Scanlon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick J. Scanlon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick J. Scanlon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick J. Scanlon. Patrick J. Scanlon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | |
| 2 | Evidence-based management of the acute coronary syndrome | 3 |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography11“ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Angiography” was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in October 1998 and by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in December 1998.22When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association request that the following format be used: Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, Carabello B, Dehmer GJ, Eagle KA, Legako RD, Leon DF, Murray JA, Nissen SD, Pepine CJ, Watson RM. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol1999;33:1756–82433This document is available on the websites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). Reprints of this document (the complete guidelines) are available for $5 each by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. Ask for reprint No. 71-0164. To obtain a reprint of the shorter version (executive summary and summary of recommendations) published in the May 4, 1999, issue of Circulation, ask for reprint No. 71-0163. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342, or e-mail pubauth@heart.org breakdown → | 842 |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 84 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 104 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | Pacemaker malfunction: fact or artifact? | 3 |
| 18 | 79 | |
| 19 | 93 | |
| 20 | 7 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.