Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging
2009461 citationsRobert C. Hendel, Daniel S. Berman et al.Circulationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Henkin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Henkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Henkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Henkin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Henkin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Henkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Henkin. The network helps show where Robert E. Henkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert E. Henkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert E. Henkin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert E. Henkin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert E. Henkin. Robert E. Henkin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hendel, Robert C., Daniel S. Berman, Marcelo F. Di Carli, et al.. (2009). ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging. Circulation. 119(22). 2201–29.461 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Stanford, William L., M A Bettmann, Lawrence M. Boxt, et al.. (2000). Acute chest pain--suspected myocardial ischemia. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.. PubMed. 215 Suppl. 7–13.1 indexed citations
5.
Stanford, William L., David C. Levin, M A Bettmann, et al.. (2000). Acute chest pain--no ECG evidence of myocardial ischemia/infarction. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.. PubMed. 215 Suppl. 79–84.5 indexed citations
6.
Donohoe, Kevin, Robert E. Henkin, Henry D. Royal, et al.. (1996). Procedure Guideline for Lung Scintigraphy: 1.0. 37(11). 1906–1910.41 indexed citations
Henkin, Robert E.. (1994). Communications among nuclear medicine professionals: one approach to sharing information.. PubMed. 35(2). 20N, 25N–20N, 25N.1 indexed citations
Henkin, Robert E., et al.. (1985). Rapid, high-efficiency labeling of leukocytes with In-111 after hemolytic removal of erythrocytes. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Chang, Wei, Robert E. Henkin, & Edward U. Buddemeyer. (1984). The sources of overestimation in the quantification by SPECT of uptakes in a myocardial phantom: concise communication.. PubMed. 25(7). 788–91.17 indexed citations
18.
Hoffer, Paul B., Carlos Bekerman, & Robert E. Henkin. (1978). Gallium-67 imaging. Wiley eBooks.14 indexed citations
19.
Pinsky, Steven & Robert E. Henkin. (1976). Gallium-67 tumor scanning. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 6(4). 397–409.35 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.