Patrick Bishop
- Public Administration top 5%
- Public Policy and Administration Research 6
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics 3
-
- E-Government and Public Services 4
- Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism 3
- Urban Studies top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering 2
-
- Medical History and Innovations 4
- History of Medicine Studies 2
-
- Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting 2
Patrick Bishop
40 papers receiving 485 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Public Administration 85
- Communication 37
- Political Science and International Relations 116
- Urban Studies 24
- Sociology and Political Science 176
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Bishop. The network helps show where Patrick Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 2 | A Public Policy Perspective on the findings from the Engaged Government: A Study of Government-Community Engagement for Regional Outcomes Project | 2006 | 1 |
| 3 | Engaged Government: A study of government-community engagement for regional outcomes - Report 2: Selection of Case Studies. | 2005 | 2 |
| 4 | Net) working the electorate | 2004 | 1 |
| 5 | 2003 | 68 | |
| 6 | E-Democracy : technological challenges to democratic theory. | 2002 | 3 |
| 7 | 2001 | 0 | |
| 8 | Customers, citizens and consultation. | 2000 | 0 |
| 9 | Local Government, Public Enterprise and Ethics | 2000 | 9 |
| 10 | The Provisional IRA | 1987 | 64 |
| 11 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1974 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1973 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1970 | 58 | |
| 16 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1966 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1965 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1961 | 3 |
About Patrick Bishop
Patrick Bishop is a scholar working on Public Administration, Archeology, History, Communication and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 50 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Medical History and Innovations (4 papers), E-Government and Public Services (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (3 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (2 papers) and History of Medicine Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (85 citations), Communication (37 citations), Political Science and International Relations (116 citations), Urban Studies (24 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (176 citations). Patrick Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Glyn Davis, Peter Wing, G. Neumann, John Kane, Lori Anderson, John M. Grange, Noel W. Preston, John Wanna, Haig Patapan and Faiz Tuma. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Public Administration, Medical History, The Spine Journal, Critical Care and International Review of Public Administration.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.