Pandora Pound
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Family Practice top 1%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
Papers in
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 15
-
- Animal testing and alternatives 10
- Co-authors
- Shah EbrahimRona CampbellPatrick GompertzMyfanwy MorganCatherine PopeNicky BrittenRoisin PillJenny Donovan
- Journals
- Clinical Rehabilitation (7 papers)Social Science & Medicine (5 papers)Age and Ageing (3 papers)Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (3 papers)Sociology of Health & Illness (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Pandora Pound
54 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
- Rehabilitation 1.0k
- Family Practice 227
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 227
- General Health Professions 1.4k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 820
Countries citing papers authored by Pandora Pound
This map shows the geographic impact of Pandora Pound's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pandora Pound with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pandora Pound more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pandora Pound
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pandora Pound. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pandora Pound. The network helps show where Pandora Pound may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pandora Pound, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 221 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 81 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 179 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 128 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 13 | Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 687 |
| 14 | 2004 | 341 | |
| 15 | Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 756 |
| 16 | 2001 | 36 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 42 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 28 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 67 |
About Pandora Pound
Pandora Pound is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Small Animals, General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 54 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (15 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (13 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (1.0k citations), Family Practice (227 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (227 citations), General Health Professions (1.4k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (820 citations). Pandora Pound has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Shah Ebrahim, Rona Campbell, Patrick Gompertz, Myfanwy Morgan, Catherine Pope, Nicky Britten, Roisin Pill, Jenny Donovan, Lucy Yardley and Gavin Daker‐White. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Rehabilitation, Social Science & Medicine, Age and Ageing, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and Sociology of Health & Illness.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.