Pamela Scott
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John C. LawrenceRobin PlevinChristopher BelhamRichard A. RothAimee D. KohnGwyn W. GouldGregory J. BrunnAndrew Paul
- Topics
- Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (15 papers)PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (7 papers)Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryThe EMBO Journal
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
Pamela Scott
60 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
- Molecular Biology 2.0k
- Plant Science 540
- Oncology 341
- Cancer Research 290
- Physiology 289
Countries citing papers authored by Pamela Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela Scott. The network helps show where Pamela Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela Scott. Pamela Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A rapid and specific method for the detection of C. Hepaticus, the agent responsible for spotty liver disease in Australia | 1 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 106 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 60 | |
| 10 | 66 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 278 | |
| 15 | 73 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Pamela Scott
Pamela Scott is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Molecular Biology and Plant Science, having authored 62 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (15 papers), PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (7 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (2.0k citations), Cancer Research (290 citations) and Orthodontics (83 citations). Pamela Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include John C. Lawrence, Robin Plevin, Christopher Belham, Richard A. Roth, Aimee D. Kohn, Gwyn W. Gould, Gregory J. Brunn, Andrew Paul, Robert J. White and Angela McLees. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The EMBO Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.