Pamela Macdonald
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Janet TreasureUlrike SchmidtElizabeth GoddardRebecca HibbsCharlotte RhindValentina CardiSabine LandauSuman Ambwani
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (29 papers)Impact of Technology on Adolescents (13 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Pamela Macdonald
30 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 513
- Sociology and Political Science 364
- Cognitive Neuroscience 142
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 106
Countries citing papers authored by Pamela Macdonald
This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela Macdonald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela Macdonald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela Macdonald more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela Macdonald
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela Macdonald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela Macdonald. The network helps show where Pamela Macdonald may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela Macdonald
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela Macdonald. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela Macdonald based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela Macdonald. Pamela Macdonald is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 67 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 66 | |
| 17 | 91 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 196 | |
| 20 | 81 |
About Pamela Macdonald
Pamela Macdonald is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Applied Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (29 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (13 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (513 citations) and Applied Psychology (76 citations). Pamela Macdonald has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Janet Treasure, Ulrike Schmidt, Elizabeth Goddard, Rebecca Hibbs, Charlotte Rhind, Valentina Cardi, Sabine Landau, Suman Ambwani, Nadia Micali and Simon Gowers. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.