Pamela Freyd

15 total papers · 414 total citations
13 papers, 146 citations indexed

About

Pamela Freyd is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Pamela Freyd has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 146 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4 papers in Education and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Pamela Freyd's work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers), Education and Technology Integration (2 papers) and Writing and Handwriting Education (2 papers). Pamela Freyd is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers), Education and Technology Integration (2 papers) and Writing and Handwriting Education (2 papers). Pamela Freyd collaborates with scholars based in United States. Pamela Freyd's co-authors include Jonathan Baron and Kathy Hirsh‐Pasek and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Educational leadership and Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Pamela Freyd

12 papers receiving 111 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Pamela Freyd	129	55	40	30	19	13	146
Elena Pagliarini	126 1.0×	64 1.2×	37 0.9×	21 0.7×	68 3.6×	19	179
Gary Woolley	126 1.0×	127 2.3×	23 0.6×	29 1.0×	23 1.2×	15	222
Ben Seipel	166 1.3×	79 1.4×	16 0.4×	17 0.6×	29 1.5×	17	239
Peter Dewitz	199 1.5×	133 2.4×	24 0.6×	48 1.6×	18 0.9×	13	249
Jantien Smit	142 1.1×	214 3.9×	33 0.8×	43 1.4×	13 0.7×	13	292
Kelly Bruce	205 1.6×	98 1.8×	17 0.4×	55 1.8×	18 0.9×	12	230
Shaher Banu Vagh	225 1.7×	102 1.9×	21 0.5×	19 0.6×	49 2.6×	10	287
Helen L. Breadmore	219 1.7×	103 1.9×	18 0.5×	76 2.5×	70 3.7×	18	249
Yaling Hsiao	166 1.3×	42 0.8×	45 1.1×	17 0.6×	111 5.8×	18	261
Rok Žaucer	103 0.8×	80 1.5×	46 1.1×	113 3.8×	13 0.7×	16	172

Countries citing papers authored by Pamela Freyd

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela Freyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela Freyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela Freyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela Freyd

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela Freyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela Freyd. The network helps show where Pamela Freyd may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela Freyd

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela Freyd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela Freyd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela Freyd. Pamela Freyd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact