Pak S. Chow

1.5k citations
17 papers · 1.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Pak S. Chow

17 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Pak S. Chow's Hit Papers

A method for routine measurements of total sugar and starch content in woody plant tissues 2004 · 549 citations
5490+7+14Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Pak S. Chow
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 295
  • Global and Planetary Change 344
  • Plant Science 548
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 78
  • Soil Science 68
Replace Jihua Hou with:
Jihua Hou China
Anneli Viherä‐Aarnio Finland
Glynn Percival United Kingdom
Lúcia Rebello Dillenburg Brazil
Ricardo Antonio Marenco Brazil
Christopher L. Beadle Australia
Daniel Kurjak Slovakia
Giovanni Marino Italy
E. Vapaavuori Finland
Olga M. Grant Ireland
Pak S. Chow relative to Jihua Hou China Jihua Hou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Jihua Hou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pak S. Chow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pak S. Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pak S. Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pak S. Chow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pak S. Chow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pak S. Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pak S. Chow. The network helps show where Pak S. Chow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pak S. Chow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pak S. Chow Line = papers co-authored together Pak S. Chow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
A method for routine measurements of total sugar and starch content in woody plant tissues
Hit paper breakdown →
2004549
2 2018213
3 201259
4 201250
5 202127
6 199425
7 201324
8 200420
9 199917
10 200716
11 201516
12 202115
13 201013
14 20246
15 20056
16 20013
17 20152

About Pak S. Chow

Pak S. Chow is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Agronomy and Crop Science, Soil Science and Ecology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioenergy crop production and management (6 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (6 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (1 paper) and Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (295 citations), Global and Planetary Change (344 citations), Plant Science (548 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (78 citations) and Soil Science (68 citations). Pak S. Chow has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Simon M. Landhäusser, Bradley D. Pinno, Victor J. Lieffers, M. Derek MacKenzie, Sylvie A. Quideau, Nate G. McDowell, Henry D. Adams, Peter V. Blenis, Morgan E. Furze and Henrik Hartmann. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Physiology, Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Canadian Journal of Soil Science and Forest Ecology and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact