P. M. Dean

4.0k total citations
64 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

P. M. Dean is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, P. M. Dean has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Molecular Biology, 29 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 20 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in P. M. Dean's work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (29 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (19 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (16 papers). P. M. Dean is often cited by papers focused on Computational Drug Discovery Methods (29 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (19 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (16 papers). P. M. Dean collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and United States. P. M. Dean's co-authors include E. K. Matthews, James E. Mills, P.‐L. Chau, Richard A. Lewis, Natasha Todorov, Timothy D. Perkins, Yuzuru Sakamoto, Stephen L. Garland, L. P. G. Wakelin and Richard J. Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Journal of Physiology and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

P. M. Dean

63 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

P. M. Dean

CTM

SURGE

SPECT

CMN

David W. Borhani United States

Brian D. Hudson United Kingdom

Colin McMartin United Kingdom

Jeffrey Brender United States

Robert T. Gampe United States

David C. Swinney United States

Jan Bieschke United States

Alexander Hillisch Germany

Chris de Graaf Netherlands

Vittorio Limongelli Italy

David W. Borhani United States

P. M. Dean

4.2k ×2.3

634 ×0.7

CTM

314 ×0.4

SURGE

486 ×1.3

SPECT

1.2k ×3.3

CMN

Citations per year, relative to P. M. Dean P. M. Dean (= 1×) peers David W. Borhani

Countries citing papers authored by P. M. Dean

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. M. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. M. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. M. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. M. Dean

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. M. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. M. Dean. The network helps show where P. M. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. M. Dean

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. M. Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. M. Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. M. Dean. P. M. Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dean, P. M.. (2007). Chemical genomics: a challenge for de novo drug design. Molecular Biotechnology. 37(3). 237–245. 2 indexed citations

Mills, James E., Iwan J. P. de Esch, Timothy D. Perkins, & P. M. Dean. (2001). slate: A method for the superposition of flexible ligands. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 15(1). 81–96. 23 indexed citations

Garland, Stephen L. & P. M. Dean. (1999). Design criteria for molecular mimics of fragments of the β-turn. 2. Cα–Cβ bond vector analysis. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 13(5). 485–498. 14 indexed citations

Todorov, Natasha & P. M. Dean. (1998). A branch-and-bound method for optimal atom-type assignment in de novo ligand design. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 12(4). 335–335. 36 indexed citations

Todorov, Natasha & P. M. Dean. (1997). Evaluation of a method for controlling molecular scaffold diversity in de novo ligand design. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 11(2). 175–192. 61 indexed citations

Dean, P. M., et al.. (1995). New perspectives in drug design. Academic Press eBooks. 38 indexed citations

Perkins, Timothy D., James E. Mills, & P. M. Dean. (1995). Molecular surface-volume and property matching to superpose flexible dissimilar molecules. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 9(6). 479–490. 38 indexed citations

Dean, P. M., et al.. (1995). The atom assignment problem in automated de novo drug design. 5. Tests for envelope-directed fragment placement based on molecular similarity. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 9(5). 457–462. 4 indexed citations

Dean, P. M., et al.. (1995). The atom assignment problem in automated de novo drug design. 2. A method for molecular graph and fragment perception. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 9(4). 351–358. 7 indexed citations

10.

Chau, P.‐L. & P. M. Dean. (1994). Electrostatic complementarity between proteins and ligands. 3. Structural basis. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 8(5). 545–564. 7 indexed citations

11.

Chau, P.‐L. & P. M. Dean. (1994). Electrostatic complementarity between proteins and ligands. 2. Ligand moieties. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 8(5). 527–544. 9 indexed citations

12.

Perkins, Timothy D. & P. M. Dean. (1993). An exploration of a novel strategy for superposing several flexible molecules. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 7(2). 155–172. 33 indexed citations

13.

Chau, P.‐L. & P. M. Dean. (1992). Automated site-directed drug design: An assessment of the transferability of atomic residual charges (CNDO) for molecular fragments. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 6(4). 407–426. 10 indexed citations

14.

Chau, P.‐L. & P. M. Dean. (1992). Automated site-directed drug design: The generation of a basic set of fragments to be used for automated structure assembly. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 6(4). 385–396. 16 indexed citations

15.

Chau, P.‐L. & P. M. Dean. (1992). Automated site-directed drug design: Searches of the Cambridge Structural Database for bond lengths in molecular fragments to be used for automated structure assembly. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 6(4). 397–406. 8 indexed citations

16.

Papadopoulos, Marios C. & P. M. Dean. (1991). Molecular structure matching by simulated annealing. IV. Classification of atom correspondences in sets of dissimilar molecules. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 5(2). 119–133. 14 indexed citations

17.

Dean, P. M., et al.. (1989). Automated site-directed drug design : the prediction and observation of ligand point positions at hydrogen-bonding regions on protein surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 236(1283). 115–124. 37 indexed citations

18.

Lewis, Richard A. & P. M. Dean. (1989). Automated site-directed drug design : the formation of molecular templates in primary structure generation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 236(1283). 141–162. 50 indexed citations

19.

Dean, P. M. & L. P. G. Wakelin. (1980). Electrostatic components of drug—receptor recognition. - II. The DNA-binding antibiotic actinomycin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 209(1177). 473–487. 6 indexed citations

20.

Dean, P. M. & L. P. G. Wakelin. (1980). DNA receptor recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 209(1177). 453–471. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact