P. L. McGeer
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Neurology top 1%
- Neurology top 1%
- Physiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Edith G. McGeerTōru YamadaToshio KawamataShigeru ItagakiE.G. McGeerHaruhiko AkiyamaN. P. SenH.C. Fibiger
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (6 papers)Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
P. L. McGeer
50 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 999
- Neurology 853
- Neurology 770
- Physiology 672
Countries citing papers authored by P. L. McGeer
This map shows the geographic impact of P. L. McGeer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. L. McGeer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. L. McGeer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P. L. McGeer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. L. McGeer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. L. McGeer. The network helps show where P. L. McGeer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. L. McGeer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. L. McGeer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. L. McGeer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. L. McGeer. P. L. McGeer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | Innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease: a model for local inflammatory reactions. | 57 |
| 3 | Glial cell reactions in neurodegenerative diseases: pathophysiology and therapeutic interventions. | 132 |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 340 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 133 | |
| 12 | 123 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Excretion of 4-Amino-5-Imidazolecarboxamide by Various Animal Species. | 1 |
About P. L. McGeer
P. L. McGeer is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (6 papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (770 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k citations) and Neurology (853 citations). P. L. McGeer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Edith G. McGeer, Tōru Yamada, Toshio Kawamata, Shigeru Itagaki, E.G. McGeer, Haruhiko Akiyama, N. P. Sen, H.C. Fibiger, Jun Wada and D G Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Lancet and The Journal of Chemical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.