This map shows the geographic impact of P. Golob's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Golob with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Golob more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Golob. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Golob. The network helps show where P. Golob may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Golob
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Golob.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Golob based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. Golob. P. Golob is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Golob, P.. (2009). On-farm post-harvest management of food grains: a manual for extension workers with special reference to Africa..10 indexed citations
3.
Cobbinah, J., et al.. (2003). Conducting ethnobotanical surveys: an example from Ghana on the plants used for the protection of stored cereals and pulses.. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).5 indexed citations
4.
Golob, P., et al.. (2001). A rapid method for estimating losses in stored cowpea. Presented at World Cowpea Research Conference III, Ibadan, Nigeria. 4-7 September 2000. [poster].1 indexed citations
Stathers, T., Brighton M. Mvumi, & P. Golob. (2000). Grain storage pest management using inert dusts. UK-based Zimbabwe Natural Resources Researchers' Workshop, Cambridge, UK. 22 February 1999. [1 day].1 indexed citations
7.
Golob, P.. (1999). The use of spices and medicinals as bioactive protectants for grains.. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations eBooks.87 indexed citations
8.
Belmain, Steven R., et al.. (1999). Ethnobotanicals - future prospects as post-harvest insecticides.. 10(5). 34–36.9 indexed citations
9.
Cobbinah, J., et al.. (1999). Conducting ethanobotanical surveys: an example from Ghana on plants used for the protection of stored cereals and pulses (NRI Bulletin 77). Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich).10 indexed citations
10.
Golob, P., et al.. (1999). Coping strategies adopted by small-scale farmers in Tanzania and Kenya to counteract problems caused by storage pests, particularly the Larger Grain Borer. Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich).4 indexed citations
Golob, P., et al.. (1995). Evaluation of some pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticides as protectants of stored dried fish. Tropical Science. 35(1). 76–92.2 indexed citations
13.
Golob, P., et al.. (1994). Use of plant materials as protectants of fish against blowfly and beetle infestation. Tropical Science. 34. 401–408.2 indexed citations
14.
Golob, P., et al.. (1990). Training extension workers in food conservation using drama and other informal techniques.. Tropical Science. 30(2). 195–205.1 indexed citations
15.
Golob, P., et al.. (1985). SUSCEPTIBILITY OF TERETRIOSOMA NIGRESCENS LEWIS (COLEOPTERA: HISTERIDAE) TO INSECTICIDE.1 indexed citations
Golob, P. & D. J. Webley. (1980). The use of plants and minerals as traditional protectants of stored products. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).110 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.