P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart

671 citations
17 papers · 233 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Classics top 5%
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • History top 1%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Papers in

P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart

14 papers receiving 130 citations

Hit Papers

:Thinking with Demons: The Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe 1998 · 184 citations
184199820262007201650100150

Peers

P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Classics 47
  • History 98
  • History and Philosophy of Science 29
  • Literature and Literary Theory 67
  • Philosophy 42
Replace Edward A. Gosselin with:
Edward A. Gosselin United States
Raymond B. Waddington United States
Alain Boureau France
Marc Fumaroli France
C. A. Patrides United States
E. William Monter Philippines
Sydney Anglo United Kingdom
Philip Sidney
Debora Shuger United States
Dyan Elliott United States
P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart relative to Edward A. Gosselin United States Edward A. Gosselin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Edward A. Gosselin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart. The network helps show where P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20191
2 20131
3 20121
4 20111
5
Witch Beliefs and Witch Trials in the Middle Ages: Documents and Readings
20114
6
The Chemical Choir: A History of Alchemy
20083
7 20077
8
Dioscorides and Antipater of Sidon: The Poems
20031
9 20037
10 19981
11
:Thinking with Demons: The Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe
Hit paper breakdown →
1998184
12 198210
13 19795
14 19752
15 19750
16 19733
17 19712

About P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart

P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart is a scholar working on Classics, Anthropology, History, History and Philosophy of Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 233 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (1 paper), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper), Medieval and Early Modern Justice (1 paper) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (47 citations), History (98 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (29 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (67 citations) and Philosophy (42 citations). P. G. Maxwell‐Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical Quarterly, Sixteenth Century Journal, The American Journal of Philology, Greece and Rome and The Classical World.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026