Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of P. Bradshaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Bradshaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Bradshaw more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Bradshaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Bradshaw. The network helps show where P. Bradshaw may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Bradshaw
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Bradshaw.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Bradshaw based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. Bradshaw. P. Bradshaw is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Morrison, J. F., H. M. Tsai, & P. Bradshaw. (1986). Conditional sampling schemes based on the Variable Interval Time Averaging (VITA) algorithm. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 87. 18052.1 indexed citations
6.
Bradshaw, P.. (1986). A bibliography of turbulent flows. STIN. 87. 13660.1 indexed citations
7.
Subramanian, Chelakara, et al.. (1985). Measurements of the low-wave-number structure of a turbulent boundary layer. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 87. 14657.2 indexed citations
8.
Bradshaw, P.. (1985). Vortex boundary-layer interactions. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).2 indexed citations
Morrison, J. F., et al.. (1984). Measurement of the correlation between the fluctuating pressure and the fluctuating velocity in a turbulent boundary layer. Kongqi donglixue xuebao. 1. 100–105.1 indexed citations
11.
Mehta, Rabindra D., et al.. (1983). Longitudinal vortices imbedded in turbulent boundary layers. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A. 83. 16682.4 indexed citations
12.
Bradshaw, P., et al.. (1982). Turbulent Vortex Flows.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
Hoffmann, P. H. & P. Bradshaw. (1978). Turbulent boundary layers on surfaces of mild longitudinal curvature. STIN. 80. 11395.14 indexed citations
15.
Smits, Alexander J., et al.. (1978). The effect of short regions of high surface curvature on turbulent boundary layers. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 80. 11393.1 indexed citations
16.
Bradshaw, P.. (1974). Effect of free-stream turbulence on turbulent shear layers. STIN. 75. 20669.26 indexed citations
17.
Bradshaw, P. & John Murlis. (1974). On the measurement of intermittency in turbulent flow. STIN. 75. 10376.5 indexed citations
18.
Bradshaw, P., et al.. (1974). Influence of the side walls on the turbulent centre-plane boundary layer in a square duct. STIN. 75. 10382.1 indexed citations
19.
Bradshaw, P.. (1973). Effects of Streamline Curvature on Turbulent Flow..296 indexed citations
20.
Bradshaw, P. & Ryan F. Johnson. (1963). Turbulence measurements with hot wire anemometers. HMSO eBooks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.