Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields
19901.4k citationsM. S. Chong, A. E. Perry et al.profile →
A Description of Eddying Motions and Flow Patterns Using Critical-Point Concepts
1987602 citationsA. E. Perry, M. S. Chongprofile →
An experimental study of round jets in cross-flow
1996574 citationsRichard Kelso, A. E. Perry et al.Journal of Fluid Mechanicsprofile →
On the mechanism of wall turbulence
1982527 citationsA. E. Perry, M. S. ChongJournal of Fluid Mechanicsprofile →
A theoretical and experimental study of wall turbulence
1986504 citationsA. E. Perry, S. M. Henbest et al.Journal of Fluid Mechanicsprofile →
Rough wall turbulent boundary layers
1969503 citationsA. E. Perry, W. H. Schofield et al.Journal of Fluid Mechanicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. E. Perry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. E. Perry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. E. Perry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. E. Perry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. E. Perry. The network helps show where A. E. Perry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. E. Perry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. E. Perry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. E. Perry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. E. Perry. A. E. Perry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Perry, A. E., et al.. (1997). On the validity of Taylor's hypothesis in wall turbulence. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne). 19.11 indexed citations
5.
Marušič, Ivan & A. E. Perry. (1997). Application of the attached eddy hypothesis for the evolution of turbulent boundary layers. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne).1 indexed citations
Perry, A. E., Richard Kelso, & T. T. Lim. (1993). Topological structure of a jet in a cross flow. In AGARD.8 indexed citations
8.
Perry, A. E., et al.. (1992). An experimental and computational study on the orientation of attached eddies in turbulent boundary layers. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne).4 indexed citations
Perry, A. E., et al.. (1985). A spectral analysis of smooth flat-plate boundary layers.10 indexed citations
12.
Perry, A. E., et al.. (1985). Local solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations in separated flows.2 indexed citations
13.
Perry, A. E.. (1984). A study of degenerate and nondegenerate critical points in three-dimensional flow fields. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 85. 20288.6 indexed citations
14.
Perry, A. E.. (1984). A series expansion study of the Navier-Stokes equations. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 85. 18306.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.