Ossip K. Flechtheim
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Law top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- History
- Topics
- German legal, social, and political studies (3 papers)Law and Political Science (3 papers)European history and politics (3 papers)
- Journals
- American Sociological ReviewHistory and TheoryThe Western Political Quarterly
In The Last Decade
Ossip K. Flechtheim
12 papers receiving 99 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Political Science and International Relations 74
- Sociology and Political Science 57
- Law 13
- Economics and Econometrics 9
- History 9
Countries citing papers authored by Ossip K. Flechtheim
This map shows the geographic impact of Ossip K. Flechtheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ossip K. Flechtheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ossip K. Flechtheim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ossip K. Flechtheim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ossip K. Flechtheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ossip K. Flechtheim. The network helps show where Ossip K. Flechtheim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ossip K. Flechtheim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ossip K. Flechtheim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ossip K. Flechtheim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ossip K. Flechtheim. Ossip K. Flechtheim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marx zur Einführung | 0 |
| 2 | Ist die Zukunft noch zu retten | 2 |
| 3 | Justiz und Nationalsozialismus | 1 |
| 4 | Marx heute : pro und contra | 1 |
| 5 | Das Gebot der Stunde : Geschichte der USPD | 1 |
| 6 | Der Kampf um die Zukunft : Futurologie | 1 |
| 7 | Von Marx bis Kolakowski : Sozialismus oder Untergang in der Barbarei? | 0 |
| 8 | Gedanke und Tat : Schriften, Reden, Briefe zur Theorie und Praxis der Politik | 1 |
| 9 | The German left since 1945 : socialism and social democracy in the German Federal Republic | 4 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | Zeitgeschichte und Zukunftspolitik | 2 |
| 13 | Die Parteien der Bundesrepublik Deutschland | 2 |
| 14 | Futurologie : der Kampf um die Zukunft | 14 |
| 15 | Futurologie : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen | 3 |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | Von Hegel zu Kelsen : rechtstheoretische Aufsätze | 1 |
| 18 | Grundlegung der politischen Wissenschaft | 2 |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 46 |
About Ossip K. Flechtheim
Ossip K. Flechtheim is a scholar working on Law, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 20 papers that have together received 142 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include German legal, social, and political studies (3 papers), Law and Political Science (3 papers) and European history and politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (74 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (2 citations) and Law (13 citations). Frequent co-authors include John H. Herz, H. A. Turner, William D. Graf and Julius H. Schoeps. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, History and Theory and The Western Political Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.