Osmo Kuusi

704 total citations
26 papers, 484 citations indexed

About

Osmo Kuusi is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Osmo Kuusi has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 484 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 5 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. Recurrent topics in Osmo Kuusi's work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (5 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (4 papers). Osmo Kuusi is often cited by papers focused on Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (5 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (4 papers). Osmo Kuusi collaborates with scholars based in Finland, Germany and France. Osmo Kuusi's co-authors include Martin Meyer, Kerstin Cuhls, Karlheinz Steinmüller, Sirkka Heinonen, Elina Hiltunen, Matti Minkkinen, Robin Gustafsson, Sohail Inayatullah, Ahti Salo and Toni Ahlqvist and has published in prestigious journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Scientometrics and Futures.

In The Last Decade

Osmo Kuusi

25 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Osmo Kuusi Finland	11	136	107	93	79	78	26	484
Mikko Dufva Finland	8	86 0.6×	65 0.6×	92 1.0×	86 1.1×	60 0.8×	27	411
Rafael Popper France	10	128 0.9×	137 1.3×	152 1.6×	122 1.5×	124 1.6×	41	661
M. Atilla Öner Türkiye	12	71 0.5×	160 1.5×	116 1.2×	36 0.5×	113 1.4×	31	434
Cristiano Cagnin Spain	10	104 0.8×	118 1.1×	121 1.3×	118 1.5×	127 1.6×	21	513
Effie Amanatidou United Kingdom	12	120 0.9×	87 0.8×	70 0.8×	121 1.5×	143 1.8×	37	529
Matthew J. Spaniol Denmark	10	87 0.6×	77 0.7×	117 1.3×	55 0.7×	31 0.4×	20	388
Frank Ruff Finland	5	66 0.5×	180 1.7×	118 1.3×	35 0.4×	53 0.7×	7	374
Alexander Sokolov Russia	13	71 0.5×	83 0.8×	47 0.5×	43 0.5×	100 1.3×	25	488
Philine Warnke Germany	12	87 0.6×	44 0.4×	86 0.9×	109 1.4×	84 1.1×	18	374
Jack Smith Canada	12	66 0.5×	125 1.2×	82 0.9×	43 0.5×	49 0.6×	33	510

Countries citing papers authored by Osmo Kuusi

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Osmo Kuusi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Osmo Kuusi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Osmo Kuusi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Osmo Kuusi

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Osmo Kuusi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Osmo Kuusi. The network helps show where Osmo Kuusi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Osmo Kuusi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Osmo Kuusi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Osmo Kuusi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Osmo Kuusi. Osmo Kuusi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kuusi, Osmo & Sirkka Heinonen. (2022). Scenarios From Artificial Narrow Intelligence to Artificial General Intelligence—Reviewing the Results of the International Work/Technology 2050 Study. World Futures Review. 14(1). 65–79. 19 indexed citations

Kuusi, Osmo, et al.. (2022). Radical Technology Inquirer: a methodology for holistic, transparent and participatory technology foresight. European Journal of Futures Research. 10(1). 3 indexed citations

Kuusi, Osmo, et al.. (2020). Digital twin: current shifts and their future implications in the conditions of technological disruption. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology. 15(2). 170–170. 9 indexed citations

Kaivo‐oja, Jari, et al.. (2020). Future Knowledge Management Challenges: Digital Twins Approach and Synergy Measurements. 8(2). 3 indexed citations

Roth, Steffen, et al.. (2018). New industrial platforms and radical technology foresight: the case of 3D printing in Finland and Europe. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management. 32(1). 65–65. 3 indexed citations

Ahlqvist, Toni, et al.. (2018). New industrial platforms and radical technology foresight: the case of 3D printing in Finland and Europe. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management. 32(1). 65–65. 4 indexed citations

Inayatullah, Sohail, et al.. (2016). Metaphors in futures research. Futures. 84. 109–114. 22 indexed citations

Kuusi, Osmo, et al.. (2016). From metaphoric litany text to scenarios—How to use metaphors in futures studies. Futures. 84. 124–132. 10 indexed citations

Kuusi, Osmo, Kerstin Cuhls, & Karlheinz Steinmüller. (2015). Quality criteria for scientific futures research. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 8 indexed citations

10.

Kuusi, Osmo, Kerstin Cuhls, & Karlheinz Steinmüller. (2015). The topical collection on quality criteria for futures research: a short introduction. European Journal of Futures Research. 3(1). 5 indexed citations

11.

Gustafsson, Robin, Osmo Kuusi, & Martin Meyer. (2014). Examining open-endedness of expectations in emerging technological fields: The case of cellulosic ethanol. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 91. 179–193. 18 indexed citations

12.

Kaivo‐oja, Jari, et al.. (2014). Future Industrial Platforms and Radical Technology Foresight: The Case of 3-D Printing in Finland. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

13.

Kuusi, Osmo. (2008). Miten tulevaisuutta voi tutkia tieteellisesti. Doria (University of Helsinki). 26(5).

14.

Kuusi, Osmo & Elina Hiltunen. (2007). The Signification Process of the Future Sign. UTUPub (University of Turku). 15 indexed citations

15.

Kuusi, Osmo, et al.. (2006). Filters of weak signals hinder foresight: Monitoring weak signals efficiently in corporate decision-making. Futures. 38(8). 908–924. 103 indexed citations

16.

Kuusi, Osmo & Martin Meyer. (2002). Technological generalizations and leitbilder—the anticipation of technological opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 69(6). 625–639. 26 indexed citations

17.

Salo, Ahti & Osmo Kuusi. (2001). Developments in parliamentary technology assessment in Finland. Science and Public Policy. 28(6). 453–464. 10 indexed citations

18.

Kuusi, Osmo. (1999). Expertise in the Future Use of Generic Technologies. Kagoshima Daigaku Kogakubu Kenkyu Hokoku. 44 indexed citations

19.

Kuusi, Osmo. (1999). Teknologisen kehityksen heikot signaalit. Doria (University of Helsinki). 2 indexed citations

20.

Kuusi, Osmo. (1999). Expertise in the Future Use of Generic Technologies. Epistemic and Methodological Considerations Concerning Delphi Studies. Aaltodoc (Aalto University). 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact