Omkar Goswami
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Accounting
- Co-authors
- Amal SanyalIra N. GangMontek S. AhluwaliaArvind VirmaniGiuseppe IarossiDavid DollarTaye MengistaeRakesh Mohan
- Topics
- Indian Economic and Social Development (6 papers)South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers)Social and Economic Development in India (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaNetherlandsNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Omkar Goswami
13 papers receiving 186 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Economics and Econometrics 187
- Sociology and Political Science 114
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 57
- Political Science and International Relations 38
- Accounting 34
Countries citing papers authored by Omkar Goswami
This map shows the geographic impact of Omkar Goswami's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Omkar Goswami with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Omkar Goswami more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Omkar Goswami
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Omkar Goswami. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Omkar Goswami. The network helps show where Omkar Goswami may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Omkar Goswami
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Omkar Goswami. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Omkar Goswami based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Omkar Goswami. Omkar Goswami is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Competitiveness of Indian manufacturing : Results from a firm-level survey | 24 |
| 2 | The economic performance of the states in the post reforms period | 76 |
| 3 | 62 | |
| 4 | Policy reform in India | 9 |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1 |
About Omkar Goswami
Omkar Goswami is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Physiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian Economic and Social Development (6 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (4 papers) and Social and Economic Development in India (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (57 citations), Economics and Econometrics (187 citations) and Accounting (34 citations). Omkar Goswami has collaborated with scholars based in India, Netherlands and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Amal Sanyal, Ira N. Gang, Montek S. Ahluwalia, Arvind Virmani, Giuseppe Iarossi, David Dollar, Taye Mengistae, Rakesh Mohan, Charles Oman and Isher Judge Ahluwalia. Their work appears in journals such as Public Choice, The Journal of Asian Studies and Modern Asian Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.