Omer Lev

32 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Omer Lev
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Management Science and Operations Research 153
  • Economics and Econometrics 155
  • Computer Science Applications 23
  • Safety Research 35
  • Health Informatics 5
Replace Taiki Todo with:
Taiki Todo Japan
Alexandros A. Voudouris United Kingdom
Simina Brânzei United States
Rupert Freeman United States
Ronen Gradwohl Israel
David L. Malec United States
Christos Tzamos United States
Inbal Talgam-Cohen Israel
Conrado Manuel Spain
David Kurokawa United States
Omer Lev relative to Taiki Todo Japan Taiki Todo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Taiki Todo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Omer Lev

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Omer Lev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Omer Lev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Omer Lev more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Omer Lev

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Omer Lev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Omer Lev. The network helps show where Omer Lev may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Omer Lev, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Omer Lev Line = papers co-authored together Omer Lev links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201224
2 201421
3 201315
4
Misrepresentation in district voting
201614
5 201714
6 201814
7 201913
8 201613
9 201311
10 201511
11 201910
12 20119
13
How robust is the wisdom of the crowds
20158
14 20168
15 20176
16 20206
17 20116
18 20186
19 20164
20 20204

About Omer Lev

Omer Lev is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Computer Science Applications, Safety Research and Management Information Systems, having authored 35 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auction Theory and Applications (22 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (18 papers), Game Theory and Applications (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (3 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (153 citations), Economics and Econometrics (155 citations), Computer Science Applications (23 citations), Safety Research (35 citations) and Health Informatics (5 citations). Omer Lev has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey S. Rosenschein, Yoad Lewenberg, Yoram Bachrach, Reshef Meir, Allan Borodin, Nisarg Shah, Ariel D. Procaccia, Yair Zick, Kobi Gal and Maria Polukarov. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Intelligence, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026