Rupert Freeman

32 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Rupert Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Management Science and Operations Research 221
  • Economics and Econometrics 293
  • General Decision Sciences 11
  • Safety Research 49
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 69
Replace David Kurokawa with:
David Kurokawa United States
Alexandros A. Voudouris United Kingdom
Peter Troyan United States
Markus Brill Germany
Omer Lev Israel
Gabriella Pigozzi Luxembourg
Jordi Massó Spain
Martin Lackner Austria
Dominik Peters United Kingdom
Alexander Westkamp Germany
Rupert Freeman relative to David Kurokawa United States David Kurokawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David Kurokawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rupert Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rupert Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rupert Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rupert Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rupert Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rupert Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rupert Freeman. The network helps show where Rupert Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rupert Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rupert Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Rupert Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017117
2 201755
3 201927
4 201720
5 201919
6 201618
7 201517
8 202015
9 201714
10 202211
11 202310
12 20159
13 20148
14 20187
15 20166
16 20176
17 20165
18 20205
19 20235
20 20175

About Rupert Freeman

Rupert Freeman is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Economics and Econometrics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 35 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auction Theory and Applications (23 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (20 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (10 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (7 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (4 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (221 citations), Economics and Econometrics (293 citations), General Decision Sciences (11 citations), Safety Research (49 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (69 citations). Rupert Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Conitzer, Markus Brill, Nisarg Shah, Haris Aziz, Toby Walsh, Edith Elkind, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, David M. Pennock, Martin Lackner and Lirong Xia. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Operations Research, Social Choice and Welfare, Mathematical Programming and Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026