Oliver Thees

831 total citations
47 papers, 633 citations indexed

About

Oliver Thees is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Mechanics of Materials and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Oliver Thees has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 633 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 20 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 9 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Oliver Thees's work include Forest Management and Policy (29 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (20 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (8 papers). Oliver Thees is often cited by papers focused on Forest Management and Policy (29 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (20 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (8 papers). Oliver Thees collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Oliver Thees's co-authors include Renato Lemm, Vanessa Burg, Gillianne Bowman, Urs Baier, Manfred J. Lexer, Marc Hanewinkel, Clemens Blattert, Stefanie Hellweg, Bernhard Steubing and Lorenz M. Hilty and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Renewable Energy and Resources Conservation and Recycling.

In The Last Decade

Oliver Thees

44 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Oliver Thees Switzerland 14 254 132 130 78 76 47 633
Thomas Buchholz United States 13 302 1.2× 198 1.5× 164 1.3× 73 0.9× 153 2.0× 32 950
Ragnar Jonsson Sweden 17 416 1.6× 270 2.0× 172 1.3× 34 0.4× 47 0.6× 46 1.1k
Tanja Myllyviita Finland 16 186 0.7× 274 2.1× 73 0.6× 75 1.0× 51 0.7× 27 682
Niclas Scott Bentsen Denmark 15 202 0.8× 204 1.5× 146 1.1× 106 1.4× 138 1.8× 34 1.0k
Giulia Fiorese Italy 13 262 1.0× 258 2.0× 186 1.4× 38 0.5× 142 1.9× 35 1.1k
Fabiano Ximenes Australia 15 169 0.7× 212 1.6× 73 0.6× 49 0.6× 79 1.0× 37 628
Chander Shahi Canada 18 417 1.6× 145 1.1× 188 1.4× 109 1.4× 72 0.9× 48 947
Fulvio Di Fulvio Austria 16 313 1.2× 111 0.8× 229 1.8× 47 0.6× 27 0.4× 45 586
Craig Johnston United States 16 477 1.9× 305 2.3× 121 0.9× 55 0.7× 31 0.4× 38 861
Kentaro Aoki Austria 9 337 1.3× 253 1.9× 84 0.6× 117 1.5× 85 1.1× 17 875

Countries citing papers authored by Oliver Thees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver Thees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver Thees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver Thees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oliver Thees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver Thees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver Thees. The network helps show where Oliver Thees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Oliver Thees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Oliver Thees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Oliver Thees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Oliver Thees. Oliver Thees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bont, Leo, et al.. (2025). A comprehensive analysis of time investment in skid trail planning for forest access. PLoS ONE. 20(2). e0317963–e0317963. 4 indexed citations
2.
Glatthorn, Jonas, Janine Schweier, Kathrin Streit, Oliver Thees, & Martina L. Hobi. (2023). Adaptiver Waldbau – mit Wissen, Vorsicht und Mut. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen. 174(2). 64–69. 2 indexed citations
3.
Lemm, Renato, et al.. (2020). HeProMo: A decision support tool to estimate wood harvesting productivities. PLoS ONE. 15(12). e0244289–e0244289. 11 indexed citations
4.
Lemm, Renato, et al.. (2020). Replacing Fossil Fuels and Nuclear Power with Renewable Energy: Utopia or Valid Option? A Swiss Case Study of Bioenergy. Energies. 13(8). 2051–2051. 6 indexed citations
5.
Thees, Oliver, et al.. (2020). Future potentials of sustainable wood fuel from forests in Switzerland. Biomass and Bioenergy. 141. 105647–105647. 17 indexed citations
6.
Zimmermann, Stephan, et al.. (2019). Bodenschutz bei der Holzernte. DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research). 20–26. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lemm, Renato, et al.. (2019). Improving Economic Management Decisions in Forestry with the SorSim Assortment Model. Croatian journal of forest engineering. 41(1). 71–83. 2 indexed citations
8.
Burg, Vanessa, et al.. (2019). Spatial hot spots and clusters of bioenergy combined with socio-economic analysis in Switzerland. Renewable Energy. 140. 840–851. 23 indexed citations
9.
Hilty, Lorenz M., et al.. (2018). Empirical validation of an agent-based model of wood markets in Switzerland. PLoS ONE. 13(1). e0190605–e0190605. 14 indexed citations
10.
Burg, Vanessa, et al.. (2018). Valorization of an untapped resource: Energy and greenhouse gas emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas through anaerobic digestion. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 136. 53–62. 83 indexed citations
11.
Thees, Oliver, et al.. (2018). An agent-based model of wood markets: Scenario analysis. Forest Policy and Economics. 95. 26–36. 8 indexed citations
12.
Thees, Oliver, et al.. (2017). Biomassepotenziale der Schweiz für die energetische Nutzung. Ergebnisse des Schweizerischen Energiekompetenzzentrums SCCER BIOSWEET. DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research). 5 indexed citations
13.
Olschewski, Roland, et al.. (2015). Marktverhalten öffentlicher Forstbetriebe in Graubünden und im Aargau. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen. 166(5). 282–290. 5 indexed citations
14.
Lemm, Renato, et al.. (2010). Ein Modell zur Bilanzierung des holzerntebedingten Nährstoffentzugs auf Schweizer Waldböden. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen. 161(10). 401–412. 2 indexed citations
15.
Lemm, Renato, et al.. (2009). The Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR)-model to describe the value-added chain in forestry.. 180. 1–14. 7 indexed citations
16.
Thees, Oliver, et al.. (2009). Holzernteproduktivitätsmodelle HeProMo - Konzeption, Realisierung, Nutzung und Weiterentwicklung. DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research). 441–466. 3 indexed citations
17.
Lemm, Renato, et al.. (2008). Das Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR)-Modell zur Beschreibung der Wertschöpfungskette Holz. DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research). 180. 1–14. 2 indexed citations
18.
Günter, Hannes, Gudela Grote, & Oliver Thees. (2006). Information technology in supply networks. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 19(5). 540–550. 17 indexed citations
19.
Lemm, Renato, et al.. (2005). Applicability of the k-nearest neighbours (kNN-) method to predict the productivity of harvesting - basic considerations and first experiences. 176. 189–200. 3 indexed citations
20.
Thees, Oliver, et al.. (2004). Reorganisation of wood production for improved performance: a swiss forest district case study. DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research). 3(2). 143–160. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026