Ognjen Barčot

469 total citations
22 papers, 245 citations indexed

About

Ognjen Barčot is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Economics and Econometrics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Ognjen Barčot has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 5 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Ognjen Barčot's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers) and Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (6 papers). Ognjen Barčot is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers) and Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (6 papers). Ognjen Barčot collaborates with scholars based in Croatia, Germany and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ognjen Barčot's co-authors include Livia Puljak, Tina Poklepović Peričić, Matija Borić, Ivana Vuka, Svjetlana Došenović, Marija Ćavar, Dawid Pieper, Goran Augustin, Krešimir Dolić and Davor Ježek and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMC Medical Research Methodology and Surgical Endoscopy.

In The Last Decade

Ognjen Barčot

20 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ognjen Barčot Croatia 10 99 37 36 31 21 22 245
Lars Jørgensen Denmark 5 46 0.5× 53 1.4× 27 0.8× 32 1.0× 11 0.5× 8 263
Bain United Kingdom 4 56 0.6× 29 0.8× 108 3.0× 57 1.8× 24 1.1× 5 423
Stella Zevgiti Greece 7 23 0.2× 25 0.7× 27 0.8× 14 0.5× 11 0.5× 10 250
Sarah Poole United States 8 16 0.2× 68 1.8× 12 0.3× 13 0.4× 45 2.1× 16 251
Melissa Murano Australia 4 19 0.2× 15 0.4× 27 0.8× 33 1.1× 26 1.2× 4 167
Scott Kinkade United States 7 26 0.3× 49 1.3× 11 0.3× 132 4.3× 22 1.0× 11 361
Albert Botchway United States 10 24 0.2× 87 2.4× 20 0.6× 36 1.2× 89 4.2× 27 388
Mónica Ballesteros Spain 8 35 0.4× 15 0.4× 43 1.2× 83 2.7× 23 1.1× 19 235
Yvonne van Mourik Netherlands 10 20 0.2× 18 0.5× 23 0.6× 16 0.5× 98 4.7× 12 290
Mengli Xiao United States 9 25 0.3× 26 0.7× 20 0.6× 23 0.7× 6 0.3× 36 219

Countries citing papers authored by Ognjen Barčot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ognjen Barčot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ognjen Barčot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ognjen Barčot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ognjen Barčot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ognjen Barčot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ognjen Barčot. The network helps show where Ognjen Barčot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ognjen Barčot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ognjen Barčot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ognjen Barčot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ognjen Barčot. Ognjen Barčot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Puljak, Livia, Vlatko Silobrčić, Marija Heffer, et al.. (2024). Difficulties in Accessing the List and Full Text of the Defended PhD Theses from Medical Schools: a Retrospective Case Study from Croatia. Acta Medica Academica. 53(1). 1–9. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hrgović, Zlatko, et al.. (2024). Comparison between extraperitoneal and transperitoneal cesarean section: Retrospective case-control study. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 229(3). 188–194. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hrgović, Zlatko, et al.. (2023). Extraperitoneal Cesarean Section after two Medial Laparotomies, Anus Prater, and Surgical Treatment of the Rectovaginal Fistula in a Patient with Crohn’s Disease: A Case Report. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 228(2). 192–195. 1 indexed citations
4.
Barčot, Ognjen, et al.. (2023). Oncological aspect of incidental appendectomy with regard to histopathological findings: A retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 49(10). 107013–107013.
5.
Meter, Mijo, et al.. (2023). Revision of Clinical Pre-Test Probability Scores in Hospitalized Patients with Pulmonary Embolism and SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. 24(1). 18–18. 1 indexed citations
6.
7.
Augustin, Goran, Mislav Mikuš, Ognjen Barčot, et al.. (2022). A novel Appendicitis TriMOdal prediction Score (ATMOS) for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a retrospective observational study. Updates in Surgery. 74(6). 1933–1941. 6 indexed citations
8.
Barčot, Ognjen, et al.. (2021). Enhanced access to recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook for improving authors' judgments about risk of bias: A randomized controlled trial. Research Synthesis Methods. 12(5). 618–629. 13 indexed citations
9.
Barčot, Ognjen, et al.. (2021). Role of Lung Ultrasound in Predicting Clinical Severity and Fatality in COVID-19 Pneumonia. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 11(8). 757–757. 14 indexed citations
10.
Barčot, Ognjen, Matija Borić, Svjetlana Došenović, & Livia Puljak. (2021). Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 21(1). 149–149. 3 indexed citations
11.
Barčot, Ognjen, Svjetlana Došenović, Matija Borić, et al.. (2020). Assessing risk of bias judgments for blinding of outcome assessors in Cochrane reviews. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 9(8). 585–593. 7 indexed citations
12.
Barčot, Ognjen, Matija Borić, Marija Ćavar, Goran Poropat, & Livia Puljak. (2020). Predictive value of abdominal drain amylase for postoperative pancreatic fistula following gastric resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 47(6). 1244–1251.
13.
Augustin, Goran, Matija Borić, Ognjen Barčot, & Livia Puljak. (2020). Discordant outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy in published meta-analyses: an overview of systematic reviews. Surgical Endoscopy. 34(10). 4245–4256. 12 indexed citations
14.
Puljak, Livia, et al.. (2020). Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 123. 114–119. 29 indexed citations
15.
Barčot, Ognjen, Matija Borić, Svjetlana Došenović, et al.. (2020). Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 20(1). 240–240. 7 indexed citations
16.
Könsgen, Nadja, Ognjen Barčot, Simone Heß, et al.. (2019). Inter-review agreement of risk-of-bias judgments varied in Cochrane reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 120. 25–32. 15 indexed citations
17.
Barčot, Ognjen, Matija Borić, Svjetlana Došenović, et al.. (2019). Risk of bias assessments for blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane reviews were frequently inadequate. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 113. 104–113. 19 indexed citations
18.
Barčot, Ognjen, Matija Borić, Tina Poklepović Peričić, et al.. (2019). Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 19(1). 170–170. 32 indexed citations
19.
Barčot, Ognjen, et al.. (2019). Risk of bias assessments for selective reporting were inadequate in the majority of Cochrane reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 112. 53–58. 22 indexed citations
20.
Vuka, Ivana, et al.. (2018). In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 106. 10–17. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lars Jørgensen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bain Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stella Zevgiti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah Poole Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melissa Murano Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Scott Kinkade Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Albert Botchway Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mónica Ballesteros Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yvonne van Mourik Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mengli Xiao
Rankless by CCL
2026