Antonia Jeličić Kadić
- Physiology
- Surgery
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Livia PuljakSvjetlana DošenovićKatarina VučićDamir SapunarMatija BorićMarija ĆavarMislav RadićViljemka Bučević‐Popović
- Topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (12 papers)Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers)Delphi Technique in Research (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- CroatiaUnited StatesBosnia and Herzegovina
In The Last Decade
Antonia Jeličić Kadić
46 papers receiving 822 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Physiology 178
- Surgery 135
- Pharmacology 126
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 112
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 100
Countries citing papers authored by Antonia Jeličić Kadić
This map shows the geographic impact of Antonia Jeličić Kadić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonia Jeličić Kadić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonia Jeličić Kadić more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Antonia Jeličić Kadić
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonia Jeličić Kadić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonia Jeličić Kadić. The network helps show where Antonia Jeličić Kadić may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antonia Jeličić Kadić
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antonia Jeličić Kadić. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antonia Jeličić Kadić based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Antonia Jeličić Kadić. Antonia Jeličić Kadić is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 159 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Antonia Jeličić Kadić
Antonia Jeličić Kadić is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Pharmacology and Family Practice, having authored 47 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (12 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (112 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (59 citations) and Pharmacology (126 citations). Antonia Jeličić Kadić has collaborated with scholars based in Croatia, United States and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Frequent co-authors include Livia Puljak, Svjetlana Došenović, Katarina Vučić, Damir Sapunar, Matija Borić, Marija Ćavar, Mislav Radić, Viljemka Bučević‐Popović, Ines Banjari and Tina Poklepović Peričić. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.