Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels
1997560 citationsJames Emil Flege, Ocke‐Schwen Bohn et al.Journal of Phoneticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ocke‐Schwen Bohn
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ocke‐Schwen Bohn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ocke‐Schwen Bohn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ocke‐Schwen Bohn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ocke‐Schwen Bohn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ocke‐Schwen Bohn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ocke‐Schwen Bohn. The network helps show where Ocke‐Schwen Bohn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ocke‐Schwen Bohn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ocke‐Schwen Bohn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ocke‐Schwen Bohn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ocke‐Schwen Bohn. Ocke‐Schwen Bohn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bohn, Ocke‐Schwen, et al.. (2023). Predicting nonnative consonant identification::The case of English consonants as perceived by native speakers of Kalaallisut (West Greenlandic).
Bohn, Ocke‐Schwen, et al.. (2019). Perceptual assimilation and graded discrimination as predictors of identification accuracy for learners differing in L2 experience:The case of Danish learners' perception of English initial fricatives.1 indexed citations
4.
Bohn, Ocke‐Schwen, et al.. (2019). Production and perception of Danish front rounded /y/:A comparison of ultimate attainment in native Spanish and native English Speakers..1 indexed citations
Bohn, Ocke‐Schwen, et al.. (2015). Perceptual assimilation and identification of English consonants by native speakers of Danish.. ICPhS.1 indexed citations
8.
Bohn, Ocke‐Schwen, et al.. (2015). Phonetic similarity predicts ultimate attainment quite well: The case of Danish /i, y, u/ and /d, t/ for native speakers of English and Spanish.. ICPhS.2 indexed citations
9.
Bohn, Ocke‐Schwen, et al.. (2015). Picking up the cues to a new consonant contrast: Danish learners' production and perception of English word-final /s/ - /z/.. ICPhS.2 indexed citations
Avesani, Cinzia, et al.. (2012). Non solo dettagli fonetici, non solo categorie fonologiche: l'interazione tra fonetica e fonologia nella percezione di suoni non-nativi. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna).
13.
Bohn, Ocke‐Schwen, et al.. (2005). In Search of a Language for the Mind-Brain: Can the Multiple Perspectives Be Unified?. Aarhus University Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
Flege, James Emil, Ocke‐Schwen Bohn, & Sunyoung Jang. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics. 25(4). 437–470.560 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.